Suppr超能文献

植物雌激素补充剂对绝经后子宫内膜影响的一项初步研究。

A pilot study of the effects of phytoestrogen supplementation on postmenopausal endometrium.

作者信息

Balk Judith L, Whiteside Deborah A, Naus Gregory, DeFerrari Emily, Roberts James M

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA.

出版信息

J Soc Gynecol Investig. 2002 Jul-Aug;9(4):238-42.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to assess endometrial histology in postmenopausal women not taking hormone replacement therapy, to evaluate side effects and efficacy of phytoestrogens in treating menopause-associated symptoms, and to determine whether 6 months of phytoestrogen supplementation altered endometrial histology.

METHODS

We performed a prospective, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial comparing the effects of 6 months of dietary phytoestrogen supplementation versus placebo in postmenopausal women. Baseline endometrial biopsies were performed and, if adequate, nonhyperplastic, noncancerous, and nonovulatory, subjects were randomly assigned to receive daily placebo or soy cereal supplementation for 6 months. Study subjects completed baseline and weekly dietary, symptom, and side effect logs. Repeat endometrial biopsies were obtained at 6 months.

RESULTS

Subjects were recruited from January 1998 through June 2000. Twenty-seven subjects were randomized, and 19 completed the study. One (3.7%) baseline endometrial sample was weakly proliferative. All other baseline and final biopsies were consistent with atrophic, inactive endometrium. The maximum risk of endometrial stimulation with phytoestrogens is 35%. Hot flushes, night sweats, and vaginal dryness were significantly less severe at the final week of the study compared with baseline in the placebo group. Insomnia was more common in the treated group. There were no other statistically significant differences in symptoms or side effects.

CONCLUSION

Phytoestrogens did not cause stimulation of the endometrium. Insomnia was more frequent over the 6-month study in the soy group, whereas hot flushes, night sweats, and vaginal dryness improved from baseline in the placebo group but not in the soy group.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估未接受激素替代疗法的绝经后女性的子宫内膜组织学,评估植物雌激素治疗绝经相关症状的副作用和疗效,并确定补充6个月植物雌激素是否会改变子宫内膜组织学。

方法

我们进行了一项前瞻性、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验,比较绝经后女性补充6个月膳食植物雌激素与安慰剂的效果。进行了基线子宫内膜活检,如果活检结果合适,即非增生性、非癌性且无排卵,则将受试者随机分配,每天接受安慰剂或大豆谷物补充剂,为期6个月。研究对象完成了基线以及每周的饮食、症状和副作用记录。在6个月时进行重复子宫内膜活检。

结果

研究对象于1998年1月至2000年6月招募。27名受试者被随机分组,19名完成了研究。一份(3.7%)基线子宫内膜样本呈弱增殖性。所有其他基线和最终活检结果均与萎缩性、静止性子宫内膜一致。植物雌激素刺激子宫内膜的最大风险为35%。与安慰剂组的基线相比,在研究的最后一周,潮热、盗汗和阴道干燥症状明显减轻。失眠在治疗组中更为常见。在症状或副作用方面没有其他统计学上的显著差异。

结论

植物雌激素不会引起子宫内膜刺激。在为期6个月的研究中,大豆组失眠更为频繁,而安慰剂组的潮热、盗汗和阴道干燥症状较基线有所改善,大豆组则没有。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验