Mothershead Jerry L, Tonat Kevin, Koenig Kristi L
Navy Environmental Health Center, 620 John Paul Jones Circle, Suite 1100, Portsmouth, VA 23708, USA.
Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2002 May;20(2):477-500. doi: 10.1016/s0733-8627(02)00004-4.
Management of a bioterrorism event will begin with early detection and intervention at the local level. Any large-scale event will require rapid state and federal assistance. Federal initiatives targeting bioterrorism have increasingly become a complex web of executive and legislative actions, frequently initiated in reaction to specific events, and often unrelated to this threat. Multiple executive and legislative branch actions have resulted in a proliferation of federal programs, and coordination of these efforts remains a significant challenge. Still, great strides have been taken to improve our defensive posture against this emerging threat, and, at all levels, governmental authorities and agencies are much better prepared to respond to such events than they were a decade ago. The events of September 11, 2001 and subsequent events are clear indicators that the timeline for preparedness has been significantly compressed. Federal emergency operations, historically designed more for recovery than response, seemed up to the task in the wake of the World Trade Center and Pentagon attacks, although there was criticism of federal responsiveness to the subsequent anthrax incidents [71,72], and the timeliness of federal resources in the event of a large-scale outbreak resulting from a bioterrorism attack has yet to be truly tested. The recent establishment of the Office of Homeland Security and the Homeland Security Council holds promise that some of these inefficiencies may be rectified and overall coordination of programs will improve. Continued improvements in the effectiveness of the federal government in meeting the challenges of this and other emerging threats to homeland security will require: Establishment of consensus standards, metrics, and measures of effectiveness for all aspects of disaster, epidemic, and terrorism management at the local, regional, state, and federal levels Delineation of expected, quantifiable state and local capabilities to mitigate, prepare, respond, and recover from all disasters, including those caused by terrorist actions Development of predefined or clear and rapidly discernible criteria for deployment of state and federal emergency resources Full accountability of program costs and expenditures Continued consolidation or coordination of the many overlapping and at times redundant federal programs.
生物恐怖主义事件的管理将从地方层面的早期发现和干预开始。任何大规模事件都需要迅速的州和联邦援助。针对生物恐怖主义的联邦举措日益成为一个由行政和立法行动构成的复杂网络,这些行动常常是针对特定事件发起的,而且往往与这一威胁并无关联。行政和立法部门的多项行动导致了联邦项目的激增,而协调这些工作仍然是一项重大挑战。尽管如此,在改善我们应对这一新兴威胁的防御态势方面已经取得了巨大进展,而且在各个层面,政府当局和机构应对此类事件的准备程度都比十年前有了很大提高。2001年9月11日的事件及随后的事件清楚地表明,准备工作的时间线已被大幅压缩。联邦应急行动在历史上更多是为恢复而非应对而设计的,在世贸中心和五角大楼遭受袭击后似乎能够胜任这项任务,尽管有人批评联邦政府对随后的炭疽事件反应迟缓[71,72],而且在生物恐怖主义袭击导致大规模疫情爆发时联邦资源的及时性还有待真正检验。最近设立的国土安全办公室和国土安全委员会有望纠正其中一些效率低下的问题,并改善项目的整体协调。要使联邦政府在应对这一及其他对国土安全的新兴威胁的挑战方面继续提高成效,将需要:为地方、区域、州和联邦层面的灾害、疫情和恐怖主义管理的各个方面确立共识标准、指标和成效衡量标准明确预期的、可量化的州和地方能力,以减轻、防备、应对和从所有灾害(包括恐怖主义行动造成的灾害)中恢复制定用于部署州和联邦应急资源的预定义或清晰且迅速可辨别的标准对项目成本和支出进行全面问责继续整合或协调众多重叠且有时冗余的联邦项目。