Grunow Alicia, Neuringer Allen
Reed College, Portland, Oregon 97202, USA.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Jun;9(2):250-8. doi: 10.3758/bf03196279.
We compared two sources of behavior variability: decreased levels of reinforcement and reinforcement contingent on variability itself. In Experiment 1, four groups of rats were reinforced for different levels of response-sequence variability: one group was reinforced for low variability, two groups were reinforced for intermediate levels, and one group was reinforced for very high variability. All of the groups experienced three different reinforcement frequencies for meeting their respective variability contingencies. Results showed that reinforcement contingencies controlled response variability more than did reinforcement frequencies. Experiment 2 showed that only those animals concurrently reinforced for high variability acquired a difficult-to-learn sequence; animals reinforced for low variability learned little or not at all. Variability was therefore controlled mainly by reinforcement contingencies, and learning increased as a function of levels of baseline variability. Knowledge of these relationships may be helpful to those who attempt to condition operant responses.
强化水平降低和基于变异性本身的强化。在实验1中,四组大鼠因不同水平的反应序列变异性而得到强化:一组因低变异性得到强化,两组因中等水平变异性得到强化,一组因非常高的变异性得到强化。所有组为满足各自的变异性条件经历了三种不同的强化频率。结果表明,强化条件比强化频率更能控制反应变异性。实验2表明,只有那些同时因高变异性得到强化的动物学会了一个难以学习的序列;因低变异性得到强化的动物几乎没有学习或根本没有学习。因此,变异性主要由强化条件控制,并且学习随着基线变异性水平的变化而增加。了解这些关系可能对那些试图调节操作性反应的人有所帮助。