Suppr超能文献

空间频率不确定性及线索对对比度检测心理测量函数的影响。

Spatial-frequency uncertainty and cuing effects on psychometric functions for contrast detection.

作者信息

Ohtani Yoshio, Mori Shuji

机构信息

Faculty of Engineering and Design, Kyoto Institute of Technology, Japan.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Jun;9(2):270-7. doi: 10.3758/bf03196282.

Abstract

In the present study, the effects of spatial-frequency uncertainty and cuing on psychometric functions for contrast detection of sinusoidal gratings are examined. For this purpose, psychometric functions were collected from 4 subjects under fixed-frequency, randomized-frequency, and cued-frequency conditions. The experiment was conducted with a temporal two-alternative forced-choice task, and five spatial frequencies in the range of 0.5 and 8.0 c/deg and seven contrast levels for each frequency were used. The results showed that the psychometric functions for the randomized-frequency condition were shallower than those for the fixed-frequency condition, supporting the single-band model for the uncertainty effects (Hübner, 1993a, 1993b). For the cued-frequency condition, the slopes of the functions were not clearly different from those for the randomized condition. These results clearly differ from those of Hübner (1996b), which showed, in the spatial two-alternative forced-choice task, steeper psychometric functions for the randomized-frequency condition than those for the fixed- and cued-frequency conditions, supporting the multiple-band model (Hübner, 1993a, 1993b). The difference suggests that the single-band model applies to the uncertainty effects in the temporal forced-choice task, whereas the multiple-band model does so in the spatial forced-choice task.

摘要

在本研究中,我们考察了空间频率不确定性和线索提示对正弦光栅对比度检测心理测量函数的影响。为此,我们在固定频率、随机频率和线索提示频率条件下,从4名受试者收集了心理测量函数。实验采用了时间二选一强制选择任务,使用了0.5至8.0周/度范围内的五个空间频率,每个频率有七个对比度水平。结果表明,随机频率条件下的心理测量函数比固定频率条件下的更平缓,支持了不确定性效应的单带模型(许布纳,1993a,1993b)。对于线索提示频率条件,函数的斜率与随机条件下的斜率没有明显差异。这些结果与许布纳(1996b)的结果明显不同,后者在空间二选一强制选择任务中表明,随机频率条件下的心理测量函数比固定频率和线索提示频率条件下的更陡峭,支持了多带模型(许布纳,1993a,1993b)。这种差异表明,单带模型适用于时间强制选择任务中的不确定性效应,而多带模型适用于空间强制选择任务中的不确定性效应。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验