Bertolotto A, Malucchi S, Sala A, Orefice G, Carrieri P B, Capobianco M, Milano E, Melis F, Giordana M T
Centro di Riferimento Regionale Sclerosi Multipla & Laboratorio di Neurobiologia Clinica, Divisione Universitaria di Neurologia, Azienda Ospedaliera S Luigi, Università di Torino, Orbassano, Italy.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002 Aug;73(2):148-53. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.73.2.148.
To evaluate the incidence and the prevalence of neutralising antibodies (NABs) to three interferon beta (IFNbeta) products in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS).
Sera were tested from 125 patients with relapsing-remitting MS. Patients were treated with IFNbeta-1b (Betaferon, n = 29) 8 MIU subcutaneously every other day, IFNbeta-1a (Avonex, n = 44) 30 microg intramuscularly once weekly, or IFNbeta-1a (Rebif, n = 36) 22 microg subcutaneously three times weekly for 6 to 18 months. An additional 16 patients were treated with Rebif 22 microg intramuscularly once or twice weekly. NABs were assessed using the cytopathic effect assay before treatment and every three months during treatment. Patients with two or more consecutive positive samples were considered to be persistent NAB positive (NAB+).
At baseline, no patients were NAB+. NABs developed during the first three months of treatment and continued to develop until month 18. Over 18 months of treatment, the risk of being persistent NAB+ was 31% for Betaferon, 15% for Rebif, and 2% for Avonex (Betaferon versus Avonex, p = 0.001; Betaferon versus Rebif, p = 0.19; Rebif versus Avonex, p = 0.04). In all patients with one or more NAB+ samples, the risk of becoming NAB+ was 38% for Betaferon, 18% for Rebif, and 7% for Avonex (Betaferon versus Avonex, p = 0.0007; Betaferon versus Rebif, p = 0.10; Rebif versus Avonex, p = 0.07). At month 18, the prevalence of persistent NAB+ patients was 31.6% for Betaferon, 18.7% for Rebif, and 4% for Avonex. Numbers of NAB+ patients observed were similar with intramuscular Rebif and with subcutaneous Rebif.
The three IFNbeta preparations have different degrees of immunogenicity, with Betaferon producing the highest incidence of NABs and Avonex the lowest. These differences should be considered by neurologists when selecting treatment for their patients with MS because NABs can reduce both bioavailability and clinical efficacy of IFNbeta.
评估多发性硬化症(MS)患者中针对三种干扰素β(IFNβ)产品的中和抗体(NABs)的发生率和患病率。
检测了125例复发缓解型MS患者的血清。患者分别接受以下治疗:干扰素β-1b(β-干扰素,n = 29),每隔一天皮下注射8 MIU;干扰素β-1a(阿沃尼克斯,n = 44),每周一次肌肉注射30 μg;或干扰素β-1a(利比,n = 36),每周三次皮下注射22 μg,持续6至18个月。另外16例患者接受利比22 μg肌肉注射,每周一次或两次。在治疗前及治疗期间每三个月使用细胞病变效应试验评估NABs。连续两个或更多阳性样本的患者被视为持续性NAB阳性(NAB+)。
基线时,无患者为NAB+。NABs在治疗的前三个月出现,并持续发展至第18个月。在18个月的治疗期间,β-干扰素持续性NAB+的风险为31%,利比为15%,阿沃尼克斯为2%(β-干扰素与阿沃尼克斯比较,p = 0.001;β-干扰素与利比比较,p = 0.19;利比与阿沃尼克斯比较,p = 0.04)。在所有有一个或更多NAB+样本的患者中,β-干扰素变为NAB+的风险为38%,利比为18%,阿沃尼克斯为7%(β-干扰素与阿沃尼克斯比较,p = 0.0007;β-干扰素与利比比较,p = 0.10;利比与阿沃尼克斯比较,p = 0.07)。在第18个月时,β-干扰素持续性NAB+患者的患病率为31.6%,利比为18.7%,阿沃尼克斯为4%。观察到的NAB+患者数量在肌肉注射利比和皮下注射利比的患者中相似。
三种IFNβ制剂具有不同程度的免疫原性,β-干扰素产生NABs的发生率最高,阿沃尼克斯最低。神经科医生在为MS患者选择治疗时应考虑这些差异,因为NABs可降低IFNβ的生物利用度和临床疗效。