Németh Zsófia, Móczár Katalin, Deák György
1st Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Blood Press Monit. 2002 Jun;7(3):191-7. doi: 10.1097/00126097-200206000-00008.
The validation of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring devices is necessary to obtain information on their accuracy. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the accuracy of the Tensioday oscillometric ambulatory blood pressure monitor according to the protocols of the British Hypertension Society and the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI).
We followed the phases recommended by the British Hypertension Society protocol: before-use calibration, in-use assessment, after-use calibration, static device validation and report of the evaluation. However, we expanded on the protocol to accommodate features required by the AAMI.
The accuracy of calibration of three Tensioday devices was tested before and after the in-use phase when each of three devices was performing 10 24 h sessions of ambulatory monitoring. As all three devices passed these phases, the accuracy of blood pressure measurement was tested in one arbitrarily selected device on 85 subjects for systolic and 85 for diastolic blood pressure values. This was done by comparing three sequential same-arm blood pressure readings obtained by the device with three readings obtained by two observers using standard mercury sphygmomanometer. The comparisons were carried out while resting in the seated, supine and standing positions for all subjects. The results were used to grade the performance of the device according to the British Hypertension Society protocol and to calculate the mean +/- standard deviation of the difference between the device and the observers, as required by the AAMI.
The Tensioday device achieved an overall grade of A for both the systolic and diastolic measurements, and had a mean difference compared with the observer-measured blood pressure of 1.4 +/- 5.3/1.0 +/- 4.7 mmHg, which satisfies the AAMI criteria for accuracy. The British Hypertension Society grading did not change when patients with low, medium, and high blood pressure were analysed separately. The AAMI accuracy criteria were fulfilled in the standing and lying positions as well.
On the basis of these results, the Tensioday ambulatory blood pressure monitoring device can be recommended for clinical use for ambulatory monitoring. The accuracy of the device needs, however, further testing in special situations, such as in pregnancy, in elderly patients and during exercise.
动态血压监测设备的验证对于获取其准确性信息至关重要。本研究的目的是根据英国高血压学会和医疗仪器促进协会(AAMI)的方案评估Tensioday示波法动态血压监测仪的准确性。
我们遵循了英国高血压学会方案推荐的阶段:使用前校准、使用中评估、使用后校准、设备静态验证和评估报告。然而,我们对该方案进行了扩展,以适应AAMI要求的特征。
在使用阶段前后,对三台Tensioday设备进行校准准确性测试,每台设备进行10次24小时动态监测。由于所有三台设备都通过了这些阶段,因此在一台任意选择的设备上,对85名受试者的收缩压和85名受试者的舒张压进行了血压测量准确性测试。方法是将该设备获得的三个连续的同侧血压读数与两名观察者使用标准汞柱血压计获得的三个读数进行比较。对所有受试者在坐位、仰卧位和站立位休息时进行比较。结果用于根据英国高血压学会方案对设备性能进行分级,并根据AAMI的要求计算该设备与观察者之间差异的平均值±标准差。
Tensioday设备在收缩压和舒张压测量方面总体等级均为A,与观察者测量的血压相比,平均差异为1.4±5.3/1.0±4.7 mmHg,符合AAMI的准确性标准。分别分析低血压、中血压和高血压患者时,英国高血压学会的分级没有变化。在站立位和卧位时也满足AAMI准确性标准。
基于这些结果,Tensioday动态血压监测设备可推荐用于临床动态监测。然而,该设备的准确性在特殊情况下,如妊娠、老年患者和运动期间,还需要进一步测试。