Kane Robert L, Lin Wen-Chieh, Blewett Lynn A
University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis 55455, USA.
Health Serv Res. 2002 Jun;37(3):667-82. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.00043.
To assess the extent and consistency of geographic differences in the use of post-acute care (PAC), and the stability of this pattern of variation.
The 5 percent Medicare data sample for 1996, 1997, and the first eight months of 1998 were used.
Patterns of PAC use for various Diagnosis-related Groups (DRGs) cross states (33 with enough cases per year) and census divisions were examined. The consistency of relative rankings for overall PAC use and use within defined DRGs was compared.
PAC use varied substantially across regions. For example, the extent of any PAC use for stroke patients varied by 12 percentage points among census regions in 1998. The pattern of PAC use was quite consistent across years; 30 of the 36 possible Spearman rank order correlations were statistically significant with coefficients ranging from 0.35 to 0.95 among the DRGs studied. The correlations among DRGs were generally high. For skilled nursing facility use, all the correlations were above 0.5 and were statistically significant; in general the patterns were highest within medical DRGs (0.65-0.93).
The variation in PAC use is not a statistical artifact. It is likely the result of several forces: practice styles, supply of services, and local regulatory practices.
评估急性后护理(PAC)使用方面地理差异的程度和一致性,以及这种变化模式的稳定性。
使用了1996年、1997年以及1998年头八个月5%的医疗保险数据样本。
研究了不同诊断相关组(DRG)跨州(每年有足够病例的33个州)和人口普查分区的PAC使用模式。比较了总体PAC使用及特定DRG内使用的相对排名的一致性。
PAC的使用在各地区之间存在很大差异。例如,1998年,不同人口普查地区中风患者使用任何PAC的比例相差12个百分点。PAC的使用模式在各年份间相当一致;在所研究的DRG中,36个可能的斯皮尔曼等级相关中有30个具有统计学意义,系数范围为0.35至0.95。DRG之间的相关性普遍较高。对于专业护理机构的使用,所有相关性均高于0.5且具有统计学意义;总体而言,医疗DRG中的模式相关性最高(0.65 - 0.93)。
PAC使用的差异并非统计假象。它可能是多种因素导致的结果:医疗实践方式、服务供应以及当地监管措施。