• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国康复服务区的发展与评估。

Development and Evaluation of Rehabilitation Service Areas for the United States.

机构信息

University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.

University of Houston-Clear Lake, 2700 Bay Area Blvd, Houston, TX, 77058, USA.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Mar 1;23(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09184-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-023-09184-2
PMID:36859285
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9976368/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Geographic areas have been developed for many healthcare sectors including acute and primary care. These areas aid in understanding health care supply, use, and outcomes. However, little attention has been given to developing similar geographic tools for understanding rehabilitation in post-acute care. The purpose of this study was to develop and characterize post-acute care Rehabilitation Service Areas (RSAs) in the United States (US) that reflect rehabilitation use by Medicare beneficiaries.

METHODS

A patient origin study was conducted to cluster beneficiary ZIP (Zone Improvement Plan) code tabulation areas (ZCTAs) with providers who service those areas using Ward's clustering method. We used US national Medicare claims data for 2013 to 2015 for beneficiaries discharged from an acute care hospital to an inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF), skilled nursing facility (SNF), long-term care hospital (LTCH), or home health agency (HHA). Medicare is a US health insurance program primarily for older adults. The study population included patient records across all diagnostic groups. We used IRF, SNF, LTCH and HHA services to create the RSAs. We used 2013 and 2014 data (n = 2,730,366) to develop the RSAs and 2015 data (n = 1,118,936) to evaluate stability. We described the RSAs by provider type availability, population, and traveling patterns among beneficiaries.

RESULTS

The method resulted in 1,711 discrete RSAs. 38.7% of these RSAs had IRFs, 16.1% had LTCHs, and 99.7% had SNFs. The number of RSAs varied across states; some had fewer than 10 while others had greater than 70. Overall, 21.9% of beneficiaries traveled from the RSA where they resided to another RSA for care.

CONCLUSIONS

Rehabilitation Service Areas are a new tool for the measurement and understanding of post-acute care utilization, resources, quality, and outcomes. These areas provide policy makers, researchers, and administrators with small-area boundaries to assess access, supply, demand, and understanding of financing to improve practice and policy for post-acute care in the US.

摘要

背景

地理区域已被开发用于许多医疗保健领域,包括急症和初级保健。这些区域有助于了解医疗保健供应、使用和结果。然而,对于开发类似的地理工具来理解急性后康复护理,关注甚少。本研究的目的是在美国开发和描述反映医疗保险受益人康复使用的急性后康复服务区域 (RSA)。

方法

采用患者来源研究,使用 Ward 聚类方法对服务于这些区域的提供者的受益人的邮政编码 (Zone Improvement Plan) 编码分区 (ZCTA) 进行聚类。我们使用 2013 年至 2015 年的美国全国医疗保险索赔数据,对从急症医院出院到住院康复机构 (IRF)、熟练护理机构 (SNF)、长期护理医院 (LTCH) 或家庭健康机构 (HHA) 的受益人进行分析。医疗保险是一项主要为老年人提供的美国健康保险计划。研究人群包括所有诊断组别的患者记录。我们使用 IRF、SNF、LTCH 和 HHA 服务来创建 RSA。我们使用 2013 年和 2014 年的数据(n=2,730,366)来开发 RSA,并使用 2015 年的数据(n=1,118,936)来评估稳定性。我们通过提供者类型的可用性、人群和受益人之间的流动模式来描述 RSA。

结果

该方法产生了 1711 个离散的 RSA。其中 38.7%的 RSA 设有 IRF,16.1%设有 LTCH,99.7%设有 SNF。RSA 的数量因州而异;有些州少于 10 个,而有些州则多于 70 个。总体而言,21.9%的受益人从居住的 RSA 前往另一个 RSA 接受护理。

结论

康复服务区域是一种新的工具,用于衡量和理解急性后康复护理的使用、资源、质量和结果。这些区域为政策制定者、研究人员和管理人员提供了小区域边界,以评估获得途径、供应、需求和对美国急性后康复护理融资的理解,以改善实践和政策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4417/9976368/67a8dad3b506/12913_2023_9184_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4417/9976368/64de8da7eda2/12913_2023_9184_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4417/9976368/67147813b858/12913_2023_9184_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4417/9976368/67a8dad3b506/12913_2023_9184_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4417/9976368/64de8da7eda2/12913_2023_9184_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4417/9976368/67147813b858/12913_2023_9184_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4417/9976368/67a8dad3b506/12913_2023_9184_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and Evaluation of Rehabilitation Service Areas for the United States.美国康复服务区的发展与评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Mar 1;23(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09184-2.
2
Post-acute care use patterns among Hospital Service Areas by older adults in the United States: a cross-sectional study.美国老年人在医院服务区的急性后期护理使用模式:一项横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Feb 25;21(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06159-z.
3
Post-Acute Care Locations: Hospital Discharge Destination Reports vs Medicare Claims.康复护理地点:医院出院去向报告与医疗保险索赔。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Apr;68(4):847-851. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16308. Epub 2019 Dec 27.
4
Comparing post-acute rehabilitation use, length of stay, and outcomes experienced by Medicare fee-for-service and Medicare Advantage beneficiaries with hip fracture in the United States: A secondary analysis of administrative data.比较美国 Medicare 按服务收费和 Medicare Advantage 受益人与髋部骨折相关的康复使用、住院时间和康复结局:基于行政数据的二次分析。
PLoS Med. 2018 Jun 26;15(6):e1002592. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002592. eCollection 2018 Jun.
5
Comparison of Functional Status Improvements Among Patients With Stroke Receiving Postacute Care in Inpatient Rehabilitation vs Skilled Nursing Facilities.比较在住院康复和熟练护理设施中接受急性后期护理的中风患者的功能状态改善情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Dec 2;2(12):e1916646. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.16646.
6
Skilled Nursing and Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Use by Medicare Fee-for-Service Beneficiaries Discharged Home After a Stroke: Findings From the COMPASS Trial.医疗保险按服务收费受益人中风后出院回家后的熟练护理和住院康复设施使用情况:COMPASS试验的结果
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 May;103(5):882-890.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.10.015. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
7
A Postacute Care Function Process Quality Measure for the Collection of Standardized Self-Care and Mobility Data: Development, Implementation, and Quality Measure Scores.用于收集标准化自我护理和活动能力数据的康复护理功能流程质量测量指标:制定、实施和质量测量得分。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Jun;103(6):1061-1069. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.01.148. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
8
Variation in Facility-Level Rates of All-Cause and Potentially Preventable 30-Day Hospital Readmissions Among Medicare Fee-for-Service Beneficiaries After Discharge From Postacute Inpatient Rehabilitation.在急性后期康复后出院的 Medicare 按服务收费受益人群中,所有原因和潜在可预防的 30 天医院再入院率在医疗机构层面的差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Dec 2;2(12):e1917559. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.17559.
9
Outcomes and reimbursement of inpatient rehabilitation facilities and subacute rehabilitation programs for Medicare beneficiaries with hip fracture.髋部骨折医疗保险受益人的住院康复机构和亚急性康复项目的治疗结果与报销情况。
Med Care. 2005 Sep;43(9):892-901. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000173591.23310.d5.
10
Who receives post-acute care? Characteristics of national population and field test sample.谁接受后期康复护理?全国人口和现场测试样本的特征。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Apr;70(4):991-1000. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17649. Epub 2022 Mar 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Social determinants of health and rehabilitation service areas: an urban and rural mediation analysis.健康与康复服务领域的社会决定因素:一项城乡中介分析
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 18;13:1562610. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1562610. eCollection 2025.
2
Contextual Determinants of Health Disparities in Utilization of Community-Based Rehabilitation Services Among Medicare Fee-for-Service Beneficiaries With Traumatic Brain Injury.医疗保险按服务付费的创伤性脑损伤受益人在利用社区康复服务方面健康差距的背景决定因素
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2025;40(2):76-85. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000001026. Epub 2025 Mar 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Variation in 30-Day Readmission Rates from Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities to Acute Care Hospitals.康复医疗机构与急性护理医院 30 天再入院率的变化。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Dec;22(12):2461-2467. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.03.033. Epub 2021 May 11.
2
Post-acute care use patterns among Hospital Service Areas by older adults in the United States: a cross-sectional study.美国老年人在医院服务区的急性后期护理使用模式:一项横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Feb 25;21(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06159-z.
3
Understanding Variation in Postacute Care: Developing Rehabilitation Service Areas Through Geographic Mapping.
理解急性后期护理的差异:通过地理绘图开发康复服务区。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 May 1;100(5):465-472. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001577.
4
Care Transition Processes to Achieve a Successful Community Discharge After Postacute Care: A Scoping Review.实现急性后护理后成功社区出院的护理过渡过程:一项范围综述。
Am J Occup Ther. 2019 Jan/Feb;73(1):7301205140p1-7301205140p9. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2019.005157.
5
Facility and Geographic Variation in Rates of Successful Community Discharge After Inpatient Rehabilitation Among Medicare Fee-for-Service Beneficiaries.在 Medicare 按服务收费受益人群中,住院康复后社区成功出院率的设施和地域差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Nov 2;1(7):e184332. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.4332.
6
Comparing post-acute rehabilitation use, length of stay, and outcomes experienced by Medicare fee-for-service and Medicare Advantage beneficiaries with hip fracture in the United States: A secondary analysis of administrative data.比较美国 Medicare 按服务收费和 Medicare Advantage 受益人与髋部骨折相关的康复使用、住院时间和康复结局:基于行政数据的二次分析。
PLoS Med. 2018 Jun 26;15(6):e1002592. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002592. eCollection 2018 Jun.
7
Factors Associated With Variation in Long-term Acute Care Hospital vs Skilled Nursing Facility Use Among Hospitalized Older Adults.与住院老年患者在长期急性护理医院和熟练护理设施之间使用差异相关的因素。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Mar 1;178(3):399-405. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.8467.
8
Use of post-acute care after hospital discharge in urban and rural hospitals.城乡医院出院后急性后期护理的使用情况。
Am J Accountable Care. 2017 Mar;5(1):16-22. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
9
Successful Community Discharge Following Postacute Rehabilitation for Medicare Beneficiaries: Analysis of a Patient-Centered Quality Measure.医保受益人的急性后期康复后成功社区出院:以患者为中心的质量措施分析。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug;53(4):2470-2482. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12796. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
10
Postacute Care Setting, Facility Characteristics, and Poststroke Outcomes: A Systematic Review.急性后期护理环境、设施特点与脑卒中后结局:系统评价。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Jun;99(6):1124-1140.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.09.005. Epub 2017 Sep 28.