Batty Kevin T, Iletr Kenneth E, Powell Shane M, Martin Jaye, Davis Timothy M E
Department of Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2002 Feb;66(2):130-6. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2002.66.130.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the bioavailability of artesunate (ARTS) and dihydroartemisinin (DHA). When the single-pass isolated perfused rat liver model was used, the hepatic bioavailability of ARTS (39 microM) was 0.20 and the bioavailability of DHA in ARTS and DHA (35 microM) perfusions was 0.12 and 0.11, respectively. Thus, the combined bioavailability of ARTS and DHA in the ARTS perfusions (0.32) was three-fold higher than the bioavailability of DHA. In the human study, eight healthy volunteers were randomized to receive oral ARTS (135 mg; 352 micromol) or oral DHA (120 mg; 422 micromol). The area under the curve (AUC(0-6 hr)) of DHA following ARTS (2.9 micromol x hr/L) was higher than the AUC(0-6 hr) of DHA following DHA administration (1.2 micromol x hr/L; P < 0.005). The dose-corrected relative oral bioavailability of DHA for DHA compared with ARTS was 43%. Thus, the use of conventional oral dosage regimens of ARTS appears preferable to oral administration of DHA.
本研究的目的是评估青蒿琥酯(ARTS)和双氢青蒿素(DHA)的生物利用度。当使用单通道离体灌注大鼠肝脏模型时,ARTS(39微摩尔)的肝脏生物利用度为0.20,在ARTS和DHA(35微摩尔)灌注中DHA的生物利用度分别为0.12和0.11。因此,在ARTS灌注中ARTS和DHA的联合生物利用度(0.32)比DHA的生物利用度高两倍。在人体研究中,8名健康志愿者被随机分组,分别接受口服ARTS(135毫克;352微摩尔)或口服DHA(120毫克;422微摩尔)。ARTS给药后DHA的曲线下面积(AUC(0 - 6小时))(2.9微摩尔·小时/升)高于DHA给药后DHA的AUC(0 - 6小时)(1.2微摩尔·小时/升;P < 0.005)。与ARTS相比,DHA的剂量校正相对口服生物利用度为43%。因此,使用传统口服剂量方案的ARTS似乎比口服DHA更可取。