Suppr超能文献

颈动脉狭窄:两种不同扫描时间的对比增强磁共振血管造影与数字减影血管造影的比较

Carotid artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced MR angiography with two different scan times compared with digital subtraction angiography.

作者信息

Sundgren P C, Sundén P, Lindgren A, Lanke J, Holtås S, Larsson E-M

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University Hospital, 221 85 Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

Neuroradiology. 2002 Jul;44(7):592-9. doi: 10.1007/s00234-002-0789-8. Epub 2002 Jun 20.

Abstract

Contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE MRA) is a non-invasive alternative to conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA). CE MRA is increasingly used as a complement to Duplex in the preoperative assessment of carotid artery stenosis. The purpose of this study was to determine if CE MRA could replace preoperative DSA. CE MRA with a scan time of 10 or 28 s was performed in 24 consecutive patients who were scheduled for preoperative DSA because of Duplex-verified severe carotid artery stenosis. Two neuroradiologists measured the degree of stenosis with three different methods, and the image quality was evaluated. DSA was used as the gold standard. For detection of severe stenosis (N. American symptomatic carotid endarterectomy trial (NASCET) > or =70%; European symptomatic carotid endarterectomy trial (ECST) > or =80%; common carotid artery method (CCAM) > or =80%), the sensitivity of CE MRA maximum intensity projection (MIP) compared with DSA was 82%-100 %, the specificity was 74%-93% and the accuracy was 77%-90%. The inter-observer agreement was higher, the image quality was better and the intracranial main arteries were better visualized with the 28 s than with the 10 s scan time. The enhancement of the jugular veins seen in 17% of the 10 s scans and in 58% of the patients with the 28 s scans did not interfere with the evaluation of the carotid arteries. CE MRA, preferably with a scan time of 28 s, can replace DSA in the preoperative assessment of most patients with carotid artery stenosis.

摘要

对比增强磁共振血管造影(CE MRA)是传统数字减影血管造影(DSA)的一种非侵入性替代方法。在颈动脉狭窄的术前评估中,CE MRA越来越多地被用作双功超声的补充。本研究的目的是确定CE MRA是否可以替代术前DSA。对24例因双功超声证实为严重颈动脉狭窄而计划进行术前DSA的连续患者进行了扫描时间为10秒或28秒的CE MRA检查。两位神经放射科医生用三种不同方法测量狭窄程度,并评估图像质量。DSA被用作金标准。对于检测严重狭窄(北美症状性颈动脉内膜切除术试验(NASCET)≥70%;欧洲症状性颈动脉内膜切除术试验(ECST)≥80%;颈总动脉法(CCAM)≥80%),与DSA相比,CE MRA最大强度投影(MIP)的敏感性为82%-100%,特异性为74%-93%,准确性为77%-90%。观察者间的一致性更高,28秒扫描时间的图像质量更好,颅内主要动脉的显示也比10秒扫描时间更好。在10秒扫描的17%患者和28秒扫描的58%患者中可见的颈静脉强化并未干扰颈动脉的评估。CE MRA,最好扫描时间为28秒,在大多数颈动脉狭窄患者的术前评估中可以替代DSA。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验