Parkash O, Girdhar B K
Central JALMA Institute for Leprosy, Taj Ganj, Agra-282001, Inde.
Acta Leprol. 2001;12(2):63-9.
The performances of two Mycobacterium leprae specific serological assays namely: phenolicglycolipid-l-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (PGL-ELISA) and a monoclonal antibody-based inhibition test (MAIT) were studied for there efficiency to detect M. leprae infection. As usual, both the tests were more sensitive to detect lepromatous leprosy patients than tuberculoid type of leprosy patients. Considering the efficiency to detect leprosy patients, the MAIT was slightly more sensitive and specific than PGL-ELISA. When the results of both assays are considered together, a better sensitivity (over the sensitivity of individual assay) was obtained while maintaining good enough specificity. These findings point out that a combinatorial approach for detection of M. leprae infection would be a better strategy to detect M. leprae infection. Hence, it may act as a better tool for measurement of bacterial load in the patients.
研究了两种麻风分枝杆菌特异性血清学检测方法,即基于酚糖脂-1的酶联免疫吸附测定(PGL-ELISA)和基于单克隆抗体的抑制试验(MAIT)检测麻风分枝杆菌感染的效率。与往常一样,这两种检测方法在检测瘤型麻风患者时比结核样型麻风患者更敏感。考虑到检测麻风患者的效率,MAIT比PGL-ELISA略敏感且特异。当将两种检测方法的结果综合考虑时,在保持足够特异性的同时获得了更高的灵敏度(高于单个检测方法的灵敏度)。这些发现指出,采用组合方法检测麻风分枝杆菌感染将是检测该菌感染的更好策略。因此,它可能是测量患者细菌载量的更好工具。