Kanchana M V, Lakshminarayana C S, Sengupta U, Sinha S, Ramu G
Madras Medical College.
Indian J Lepr. 1992 Jan-Mar;64(1):42-50.
Seventy-eight untreated leprosy patients, 104 treated patients and 105 healthy contacts were tested using two serological tests, SACT (serum antibody competition test based on competitive inhibition of monoclonal antibody binding to the MY2a determinant of M. leprae) and ELISA (measurement of IgM antibodies to the neoglycoproteins D-BSA and ND-BSA representing the phenolic-glycolipid antigen of M. leprae). The controls included normal healthy individuals, patients with sputum positive pulmonary tuberculosis, and active cases of rheumatoid arthritis from the department of rheumatology. The specificity of SACT was found to be very high. ELISA was found to be positive in two patients with rheumatoid arthritis, one each for D-BSA and ND-BSA ELISA. Both tests had a high sensitivity in BL and lepromatous patients. The sensitivity to both tests was considerably lower in tuberculoid and BT patients i.e., below 40%. Therefore the diagnostic value of a negative test in suspected cases of leprosy was very low employing either of the two tests. A proportion of patients with paucibacillary tuberculoid and BT leprosy were positive after six months or longer after therapy. Similarly a large number of BL and lepromatous patients were positive after considerably longer periods of treatment. The use of either tests for determining the duration of therapy is therefore limited. SACT appears to be more sensitive than ELISA with ND-BSA in detecting subclinical infection. The cumulative positivity of the two tests may be used as a measure of the infectivity of the disease in the community and for evaluating disease control methods.
使用两种血清学检测方法,即SACT(基于单克隆抗体与麻风杆菌MY2a决定簇结合的竞争性抑制作用的血清抗体竞争试验)和ELISA(检测针对代表麻风杆菌酚糖脂抗原的新糖蛋白D-BSA和ND-BSA的IgM抗体),对78例未经治疗的麻风病患者、104例接受治疗的患者和105名健康接触者进行了检测。对照包括正常健康个体、痰涂片阳性肺结核患者以及风湿病科的类风湿关节炎活动期病例。结果发现SACT的特异性非常高。在两名类风湿关节炎患者中,ELISA检测呈阳性,分别为D-BSA ELISA和ND-BSA ELISA各1例。两种检测方法在瘤型和麻风结节型患者中均具有较高的敏感性。在结核样型和界线类偏结核样型患者中,两种检测方法的敏感性均显著较低,即低于40%。因此,在疑似麻风病病例中,使用这两种检测方法中的任何一种进行阴性检测的诊断价值都非常低。一部分少菌型结核样型和界线类偏结核样型麻风病患者在治疗6个月或更长时间后呈阳性。同样,大量瘤型和麻风结节型患者在治疗相当长一段时间后呈阳性。因此,使用这两种检测方法中的任何一种来确定治疗持续时间都受到限制。在检测亚临床感染方面,SACT似乎比ND-BSA ELISA更敏感。两种检测方法的累积阳性率可作为衡量社区中该疾病传染性以及评估疾病控制方法的指标。