Emre M
Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Neurology, Turkey.
Int J Clin Pract Suppl. 2002 Jun(127):64-72.
Despite recognition that cholinesterase inhibitors can provide clinical benefits for patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), the average durations of treatment and beneficial effects are not optimal in all cases. This may be due to disappointing efficacy or poor tolerability of the initial treatment, as well as secondary efficacy failure or adverse effects emerging during the maintenance phase. In such cases, pharmacological differences between available cholinesterase inhibitors provide a good rationale to switch to another drug in the same class. The pharmacological properties of rivastigmine, a dual inhibitor of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and butyrylcholinesterase, and donepezil and galantamine, two AChE-selective inhibitors, are reviewed. Rivastigmine is reported to show brain- and brain region-selectivity. Donepezil appeared to be more selective for central than peripheral enzymes in rats. Galantamine and donepezil have also been shown to exert nicotinic receptor allosteric modulation in vitro, while rivastigmine has been shown to increase binding of acetylcholine to nicotinic receptors in the AD brain. Donepezil and galantamine are metabolised by the hepatic CYP450 system, whereas rivastigmine is metabolised by its target enzymes. Several switching studies indicated that a substantial proportion of patients who fail to benefit from treatment with donepezil could draw benefits after being switched to rivastigmine. An immediate switch from donepezil to rivastigmine was reported to be well tolerated and was not associated with cholinergic side effects. A post hoc analysis of a 5-month trial with galantamine showed that patients had similar efficacy outcomes, whether or not they had received prior anticholinesterase therapy, suggesting that a previous failure to respond to another cholinesterase inhibitor did not predict response to galantamine. On the basis of available data it is suggested that patients not tolerating or not responding to one particular cholinesterase inhibitor may still draw benefits upon switching to another.
尽管人们认识到胆碱酯酶抑制剂可为阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者带来临床益处,但在所有病例中,平均治疗时长和有益效果并不理想。这可能是由于初始治疗的疗效令人失望或耐受性差,以及维持阶段出现继发疗效失败或不良反应。在这种情况下,现有胆碱酯酶抑制剂之间的药理学差异为换用同一类别的另一种药物提供了充分的理由。本文综述了乙酰胆碱酯酶(AChE)和丁酰胆碱酯酶的双重抑制剂卡巴拉汀,以及两种AChE选择性抑制剂多奈哌齐和加兰他敏的药理学特性。据报道,卡巴拉汀具有脑和脑区选择性。在大鼠中,多奈哌齐对中枢酶的选择性似乎高于外周酶。加兰他敏和多奈哌齐在体外也已显示出对烟碱受体的变构调节作用,而卡巴拉汀已被证明可增加AD脑中乙酰胆碱与烟碱受体的结合。多奈哌齐和加兰他敏由肝脏CYP450系统代谢,而卡巴拉汀由其靶酶代谢。多项换药研究表明,相当一部分未从多奈哌齐治疗中获益的患者换用卡巴拉汀后可能会受益。据报道,从多奈哌齐立即换用卡巴拉汀耐受性良好,且与胆碱能副作用无关。一项对加兰他敏进行的为期5个月试验的事后分析表明,无论患者此前是否接受过抗胆碱酯酶治疗,其疗效结果相似,这表明先前对另一种胆碱酯酶抑制剂无反应并不能预测对加兰他敏的反应。根据现有数据,建议对一种特定胆碱酯酶抑制剂不耐受或无反应的患者换用另一种药物后仍可能获益。