Bullock Roger, Touchon Jacques, Bergman Howard, Gambina Giuseppe, He Yunsheng, Rapatz Günter, Nagel Jennifer, Lane Roger
Kingshill Research Centre, Victoria Hospital, Swindon, UK.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2005 Aug;21(8):1317-27. doi: 10.1185/030079905X56565.
Randomised controlled trials that directly compare cholinesterase inhibitors for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease have been characterised by significant methodological limitations. As a consequence, they have failed to establish whether there are differences between agents in this class. To help address this question, a double-blind, randomised, controlled, multicentre trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of cholinesterase inhibitor treatment in patients with moderate to moderately-severe Alzheimer's disease over a 2-year period.
Patients were randomly assigned to rivastigmine 3-12 mg/day or donepezil 5-10 mg/day. Efficacy measures comprised assessments of cognition, activities of daily living, global functioning and behavioural symptoms. Safety and tolerability assessments included adverse events and measurement of vital signs.
In total, 994 patients received cholinesterase inhibitor treatment (rivastigmine, n = 495; donepezil, n = 499), and 57.9% of patients completed the study. The most frequent reason for premature discontinuation in both treatment groups was adverse events, primarily gastrointestinal. Adverse events were more frequent in the rivastigmine group during the titration phase, but similar in the maintenance phase. Serious adverse events were reported by 31.7% of rivastigmine- and 32.5% of donepezil-treated patients, respectively. Rivastigmine and donepezil had similar effects on measures of cognition and behaviour, but rivastigmine showed a statistically significant advantage on measures of activities of daily living and global functioning in the ITT-LOCF population. However, this was not maintained in the non-ITT-LOCF populations. In secondary subgroup analyses, AD patients who had genotypes that encoded for full expression of the butyrylcholinesterase enzyme (BuChE wt/wt; n = 226/340), who were < 75 years of age (n = 362/994) or who had symptoms suggestive of concomitant Lewy body disease (n = 49/994) showed significantly greater benefits from rivastigmine treatment.
Cholinesterase inhibitor treatment may offer continued therapeutic benefit for up to 2 years in patients with moderate AD. Although both drugs performed similarly on cognition and behaviour, rivastigmine may provide greater benefit in activities of daily living and global functioning.
直接比较用于治疗阿尔茨海默病的胆碱酯酶抑制剂的随机对照试验存在显著的方法学局限性。因此,它们未能确定该类药物之间是否存在差异。为了帮助解决这个问题,设计了一项双盲、随机、对照、多中心试验,以评估胆碱酯酶抑制剂治疗中度至中度重度阿尔茨海默病患者2年的疗效和耐受性。
患者被随机分配至服用3 - 12毫克/天的卡巴拉汀或5 - 10毫克/天的多奈哌齐。疗效指标包括认知、日常生活活动、整体功能和行为症状的评估。安全性和耐受性评估包括不良事件和生命体征测量。
共有994名患者接受胆碱酯酶抑制剂治疗(卡巴拉汀,n = 495;多奈哌齐,n = 499),57.9%的患者完成了研究。两个治疗组过早停药的最常见原因是不良事件,主要是胃肠道不良事件。在滴定阶段,卡巴拉汀组的不良事件更频繁,但在维持阶段相似。分别有31.7%接受卡巴拉汀治疗的患者和32.5%接受多奈哌齐治疗的患者报告了严重不良事件。卡巴拉汀和多奈哌齐对认知和行为指标有相似的影响,但在ITT - LOCF人群中,卡巴拉汀在日常生活活动和整体功能指标上显示出统计学上的显著优势。然而,在非ITT - LOCF人群中并非如此。在次要亚组分析中,编码丁酰胆碱酯酶(BuChE wt/wt;n = 226/340)完全表达基因型的阿尔茨海默病患者、年龄小于75岁(n = 362/994)或有提示合并路易体病症状(n = 49/994)的患者从卡巴拉汀治疗中获益显著更大。
胆碱酯酶抑制剂治疗对中度阿尔茨海默病患者可能在长达2年的时间内持续提供治疗益处。虽然两种药物在认知和行为方面表现相似,但卡巴拉汀可能在日常生活活动和整体功能方面提供更大益处。