Wodarski J S, Feldman R A, Pedi S J
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1975;3(3):255-73. doi: 10.1007/BF00916755.
Eighty-four prosocial children and 14 children defined as antisocial according to various diagnostic measures utilized by the professional therapeutic community were compared as to incidences of prosocial, nonsocial, and antisocial behaviors exhibited at a summer camp. Additionally, the children and their group counselors completed various inventories posited to measure antisocial behavior. A time-sampling procedure used to secure behavioral measurements on the children each day, when possible, during 60-minute intervals for a 5-week period, revealed no significant differences on prosocial,nonsocial, and antisocial behavior. Self inventories provided data contradictory to the behavioral data. The results of the study are discussed in terms of the difficulties involved in operationalizing the concept of antisocial behavior and the possibility that the antisocial children may have been labeled.
根据专业治疗团体使用的各种诊断方法,将84名亲社会儿童和14名被定义为反社会的儿童,就他们在夏令营中表现出的亲社会、非社会和反社会行为的发生率进行了比较。此外,这些儿童及其团体辅导员完成了各种旨在测量反社会行为的量表。在为期5周的时间里,每天尽可能在60分钟的时间段内,采用时间抽样程序对儿童的行为进行测量,结果显示在亲社会、非社会和反社会行为方面没有显著差异。自我量表提供的数据与行为数据相矛盾。研究结果从反社会行为概念操作化所涉及的困难以及反社会儿童可能被贴标签的可能性方面进行了讨论。