Green Vanessa A, Cillessen Antonius H N, Rechis Ruth, Patterson Meagan M, Hughes Julie Milligan
Jessie Hetherington Centre for Educational Research, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.
J Genet Psychol. 2008 Mar;169(1):92-112. doi: 10.3200/GNTP.169.1.92-112.
In the present study, the authors investigated what prosocial-assertive, passive, and coercive strategies 6-year-olds (N=257) would propose in response to stories about 2 socially challenging situations: displacing another child in a game and obtaining a toy from another child. The scenarios also varied the gender composition of the characters. Participants' verbalizations while acting out their responses using toy props fell into 13 categories of strategies. Teachers reported antisocial behavior and social competence of the participants. Girls and boys responded similarly in their general suggestions of prosocial or assertive strategies, but girls were more likely to offer prosocial strategies with other girls than with boys. Teacher-rated competence and antisocial behavior interacted in predicting coercive responses by girls but not by boys. The results demonstrate that prosocial and antisocial behaviors need to be considered in interaction to fully understand the nature of social competence.
在本研究中,作者调查了257名6岁儿童会针对两种具有社会挑战性的情境故事提出哪些亲社会-坚定、被动和强制策略:在游戏中取代另一个孩子,以及从另一个孩子那里获得一个玩具。这些情境还改变了角色的性别构成。参与者在使用玩具道具表演他们的反应时的言语表达分为13类策略。教师报告了参与者的反社会行为和社交能力。女孩和男孩在亲社会或坚定策略的总体建议上反应相似,但女孩与其他女孩在一起时比与男孩在一起时更有可能提供亲社会策略。教师评定的能力和反社会行为在预测女孩的强制反应方面存在交互作用,但在预测男孩的强制反应方面不存在交互作用。结果表明,需要在交互作用中考虑亲社会行为和反社会行为,以充分理解社交能力的本质。