Ouchi Kiyoaki, Mikuni Junichi, Kakugawa Yoichiro
Department of Surgery, Miyagi Cancer Center Hospital, 47-1 Nodayama Shiode-Medishima, Natori 981-1293, Japan.
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2002;9(2):256-60. doi: 10.1007/s005340200028.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The long-term effects of initial laparoscopic cholecystectomy on the prognosis of patients with GBC remain unknown because of the limited numbers of patients reported from single institutions. This study was designed to determine the long-term prognosis of patients with gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) who had undergone laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), and to clarify the role of LC for the treatment of GBC and the benefit of aggressive additional excision.
The clinical courses and outcomes of 498 patients with laparoscopically removed GBC registered in a nationwide survey were examined. Written questionnaires sent to members of the Japanese Society of Biliary Surgery included questions on Preoperative diagnosis, timing and methods to obtain final diagnosis, depth of invasion, second surgical procedure, prognosis of patients, and type of recurrence, if any.
The 5-year survival rates of patients after LC according to the depth of invasion were as follows: 99% in those with pT1a (limited to the mucosa), 95% in those with pT1b (muscularis), 70% in those with pT2 (subserosa), 20% in those with pT3 (serosa), and 0% in those with pT4 (serosa with invasion to adjacent organs). Perforation of the gallbladder during LC was found in 20% of the patients. Patients with gallbladders perforated during LC showed a significantly lower survival rate than did those without perforated gallbladders ( P < 0.01). Additional excision during or after LC was carried out in 48% of the patients, and the frequency of additional excision increased in accordance with the depth of invasion. Compared with patients who underwent LC only, additional excision resulted in better survival in patients with pT2 or pT3 tumors ( P = 0.051 and P < 0.05, respectively), but this difference was not found in patients with pT1 or pT4 tumors.
LC is not likely to worsen the survival rate of patients with GBC compared with the survival rate of patients undergoing a standard open radical procedure, as long as additional excision is conducted for patients with laparoscopically removed pT2 or pT3 GBCs. Special attention should be paid to prevention of bile spillage during LC.
背景/目的:由于单机构报告的患者数量有限,初始腹腔镜胆囊切除术对胆囊癌(GBC)患者预后的长期影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在确定接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)的胆囊癌患者的长期预后,并阐明LC在GBC治疗中的作用以及积极进行额外切除的益处。
对全国性调查中登记的498例行腹腔镜切除GBC的患者的临床病程和结局进行了检查。向日本胆道外科学会成员发送的书面问卷包括有关术前诊断、获得最终诊断的时间和方法、浸润深度、二次手术、患者预后以及复发类型(如有)的问题。
根据浸润深度,LC术后患者的5年生存率如下:pT1a(限于黏膜)患者为99%,pT1b(肌层)患者为95%,pT2(浆膜下层)患者为70%,pT3(浆膜)患者为20%,pT4(浆膜并侵犯相邻器官)患者为0%。20%的患者在LC期间发生胆囊穿孔。LC期间发生胆囊穿孔的患者的生存率明显低于未发生胆囊穿孔的患者(P<0.01)。48%的患者在LC期间或之后进行了额外切除,额外切除的频率随着浸润深度的增加而增加。与仅接受LC的患者相比,额外切除使pT2或pT3肿瘤患者的生存率更高(分别为P=0.051和P<0.05),但在pT1或pT4肿瘤患者中未发现这种差异。
与接受标准开放根治性手术的患者的生存率相比,只要对腹腔镜切除pT2或pT3 GBC的患者进行额外切除,LC不太可能降低GBC患者的生存率。LC期间应特别注意防止胆汁溢出。