• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Outpatient encounter data for risk adjustment: strategic issues for Medicare and Medicaid.

作者信息

Welch W Pete

机构信息

Mid Atlantic Medical Services, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA.

出版信息

J Ambul Care Manage. 2002 Jul;25(3):1-15. doi: 10.1097/00004479-200207000-00002.

DOI:10.1097/00004479-200207000-00002
PMID:12141013
Abstract

Payers are increasingly using diagnostic data from outpatient encounter records to adjust the payment to health plans. Although much has been written about the ability of such data to predict health care costs, little has been written about the data itself--its quality and availability. Fee-for-service (FFS) data face several threats to their validity, including the possibility that they may seriously underreport diagnoses. Because the systems and incentives that yield FFS and managed care diagnosis data are quite different, they may not be comparable, depending on circumstances such as audit rules. The next generation of risk adjustment models should be designed around the capabilities and potentialities of plans' information systems.

摘要

相似文献

1
Outpatient encounter data for risk adjustment: strategic issues for Medicare and Medicaid.
J Ambul Care Manage. 2002 Jul;25(3):1-15. doi: 10.1097/00004479-200207000-00002.
2
Cost-sharing, physician utilization, and adverse selection among Medicare beneficiaries with chronic health conditions.患有慢性健康状况的医疗保险受益人中的费用分担、医生利用情况及逆向选择。
Med Care Res Rev. 2015 Feb;72(1):49-70. doi: 10.1177/1077558714563169. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
3
Risk selection in the Massachusetts State employee health insurance program.
Health Care Manag Sci. 2001 Dec;4(4):281-7. doi: 10.1023/a:1011842327930.
4
Changes in ambulatory utilization after switching from Medicaid fee-for-service to managed care.从医疗补助按服务收费制转为管理式医疗后门诊服务利用情况的变化。
Am J Manag Care. 2019 Sep 1;25(9):e254-e260.
5
Cost-minimizing risk adjustment.
J Health Econ. 2002 May;21(3):515-30. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(02)00005-x.
6
Implementation of risk adjustment for Medicare.医疗保险风险调整的实施。
Health Care Financ Rev. 2000 Spring;21(3):119-26.
7
Medicare's risk-adjusted capitation method.医疗保险的风险调整后的人头付费法。
J Health Care Finance. 2002 Spring;28(3):105-19.
8
Clinical Risk Groups (CRGs): a classification system for risk-adjusted capitation-based payment and health care management.临床风险组(CRGs):一种基于风险调整的按人头付费和医疗保健管理的分类系统。
Med Care. 2004 Jan;42(1):81-90. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000102367.93252.70.
9
Discretionary hospital use and diagnostic risk adjustment of Medicare HMO capitation rates.医疗保险健康维护组织(HMO)人头费率的酌情医院使用情况及诊断风险调整
Inquiry. 2000 Summer;37(2):162-72.
10
A comparison of inpatient severity, average length of stay, and cost for traditional fee-for-service medicare and medicare HMOs in Florida.佛罗里达州传统按服务收费医疗保险与医疗保险健康维护组织的住院严重程度、平均住院天数及费用比较。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2004 Oct-Dec;29(4):320-8. doi: 10.1097/00004010-200410000-00008.

引用本文的文献

1
A Review on Methods of Risk Adjustment and their Use in Integrated Healthcare Systems.风险调整方法及其在综合医疗系统中的应用综述
Int J Integr Care. 2016 Oct 26;16(4):4. doi: 10.5334/ijic.2500.
2
Applying a risk-adjustment framework to primary care: can we improve on existing measures?将风险调整框架应用于初级保健:我们能否改进现有措施?
Ann Fam Med. 2003 May-Jun;1(1):44-51. doi: 10.1370/afm.6.