• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于协商电话支持对1型糖尿病青少年血糖控制效果的随机对照试验。

A randomized control trial of the effect of negotiated telephone support on glycaemic control in young people with Type 1 diabetes.

作者信息

Howells L, Wilson A C, Skinner T C, Newton R, Morris A D, Greene S A

机构信息

Tayside Institute of Child Health, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland, UK.

出版信息

Diabet Med. 2002 Aug;19(8):643-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2002.00791.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1464-5491.2002.00791.x
PMID:12147144
Abstract

AIM

To evaluate changes in self-efficacy for self-management in young people with Type 1 diabetes participating in a "Negotiated Telephone Support" (NTS) intervention developed using the principles of problem solving and social learning theory.

METHODS

One-year RCT with 79 young people (male 39; mean age +/- sd 16.5 +/- 3.2 years, duration 6.7 +/- 4.4 years, HbA(1c) 8.6 +/- 1.5%) randomized into: Group 1 (control group), continued routine management, n = 28; Group 2, continued routine management with NTS, n = 25; Group 3, annual clinic with NTS, n = 26.

OUTCOME MEASURES

HbA(1c), self-efficacy, barriers to adherence, problem solving, and diabetes knowledge.

RESULTS

There were no differences between the groups at baseline. Participants in Groups 2 and 3 received an average of 16 telephone calls/year (range 5-19), median duration 9 min (2-30), with a median interval of 3 weeks (1-24) between calls. Significant correlations were found between age and average length of call (r = 0.44, P < 0.01) and frequency of contact (r = 0.36, P < 0.05). Social and school topics were discussed frequently. After 1 year, while the participants in the two intervention groups showed significant improvements in self-efficacy (P = 0.035), there was no difference in glycaemic control in the three groups. Barriers to insulin use adherence were a significant predictor of HbA(1c) (P < 0.001) after controlling for baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

NTS is an effective medium to deliver a simple theory-based psychological intervention to enhance self-efficacy for diabetes self-management. Reduced clinic attendance, combined with NTS, did not result in a deterioration of HbA(1c). Intensive personal support needs to be combined with intensive diabetes therapy to improve glycaemic control in this age group.

摘要

目的

评估参与一项基于问题解决和社会学习理论原则开发的“协商电话支持”(NTS)干预的1型糖尿病青少年自我管理自我效能的变化。

方法

对79名青少年(男性39名;平均年龄±标准差16.5±3.2岁,病程6.7±4.4年,糖化血红蛋白8.6±1.5%)进行为期一年的随机对照试验,随机分为:第1组(对照组),继续常规管理,n = 28;第2组,继续常规管理并接受NTS,n = 25;第3组,每年接受一次门诊并接受NTS,n = 26。

观察指标

糖化血红蛋白、自我效能、依从性障碍、问题解决能力和糖尿病知识。

结果

各组在基线时无差异。第2组和第3组的参与者平均每年接到16个电话(范围5 - 19个),通话时长中位数为9分钟(2 - 30分钟),通话间隔中位数为3周(1 - 24周)。发现年龄与平均通话时长(r = 0.44,P < 0.01)和联系频率(r = 0.36,P < 0.05)之间存在显著相关性。社会和学校话题经常被讨论。1年后,虽然两个干预组的参与者自我效能有显著改善(P = 0.035),但三组的血糖控制无差异。在控制基线后,胰岛素使用依从性障碍是糖化血红蛋白的显著预测因素(P < 0.001)。

结论

NTS是一种有效的媒介,可提供基于简单理论的心理干预,以增强糖尿病自我管理的自我效能。减少门诊就诊次数并结合NTS,并未导致糖化血红蛋白恶化。在这个年龄组中,强化个人支持需要与强化糖尿病治疗相结合以改善血糖控制。

相似文献

1
A randomized control trial of the effect of negotiated telephone support on glycaemic control in young people with Type 1 diabetes.一项关于协商电话支持对1型糖尿病青少年血糖控制效果的随机对照试验。
Diabet Med. 2002 Aug;19(8):643-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2002.00791.x.
2
A randomized controlled trial of Sweet Talk, a text-messaging system to support young people with diabetes.一项针对“甜言蜜语”(一种支持糖尿病青少年的短信系统)的随机对照试验。
Diabet Med. 2006 Dec;23(12):1332-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2006.01989.x.
3
Predictors of glycaemic control in patients with Type 1 diabetes commencing continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion therapy.1 型糖尿病患者起始持续皮下胰岛素输注治疗的血糖控制预测因素。
Diabet Med. 2010 Mar;27(3):339-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02925.x.
4
Diabetes control with reciprocal peer support versus nurse care management: a randomized trial.采用互惠同伴支持与护士照护管理控制糖尿病:一项随机试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2010 Oct 19;153(8):507-15. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-153-8-201010190-00007.
5
A longitudinal observational study of insulin therapy and glycaemic control in Scottish children with Type 1 diabetes: DIABAUD 3.苏格兰1型糖尿病儿童胰岛素治疗与血糖控制的纵向观察研究:DIABAUD 3
Diabet Med. 2006 Nov;23(11):1216-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2006.01962.x.
6
Sustained benefit of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion on glycaemic control and hypoglycaemia in adults with Type 1 diabetes.持续皮下胰岛素输注对1型糖尿病成人患者血糖控制和低血糖的持续益处。
Diabet Med. 2015 Nov;32(11):1453-9. doi: 10.1111/dme.12869. Epub 2015 Aug 19.
7
Determinants of glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes during intensified therapy with multiple daily insulin injections or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion: importance of blood glucose variability.多次每日胰岛素注射或持续皮下胰岛素输注强化治疗期间1型糖尿病血糖控制的决定因素:血糖变异性的重要性
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2006 May-Jun;22(3):232-7. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.614.
8
ROSES: role of self-monitoring of blood glucose and intensive education in patients with Type 2 diabetes not receiving insulin. A pilot randomized clinical trial.ROSES:2 型糖尿病未接受胰岛素治疗患者的自我血糖监测和强化教育的作用。一项随机临床试验。
Diabet Med. 2011 Jul;28(7):789-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03268.x.
9
Patient-directed titration for achieving glycaemic goals using a once-daily basal insulin analogue: an assessment of two different fasting plasma glucose targets - the TITRATE study.患者导向的滴定以实现使用每日一次基础胰岛素类似物的血糖目标:两种不同空腹血糖目标的评估 - TITRATE 研究。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2009 Jun;11(6):623-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2009.01060.x.
10
The effect of a structured behavioral intervention on poorly controlled diabetes: a randomized controlled trial.结构化行为干预对控制不佳的糖尿病的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Arch Intern Med. 2011 Dec 12;171(22):1990-9. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.502. Epub 2011 Oct 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Can a mobile application improve glucose-related and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in people with type 1 diabetes mellitus? A randomized controlled trial using the mySugr app.一款移动应用程序能否改善1型糖尿病患者的血糖相关指标及患者报告结局指标(PROMs)?一项使用mySugr应用程序的随机对照试验。
Hormones (Athens). 2025 Mar;24(1):137-147. doi: 10.1007/s42000-024-00609-z. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
2
Effectiveness of resilience-promoting interventions in adolescents with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.促进青少年糖尿病患者适应力的干预措施的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Pediatr. 2023 Apr;19(4):323-339. doi: 10.1007/s12519-022-00666-7. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
3
ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: Diabetes education in children and adolescents.
《国际儿童青少年糖尿病研究学会(ISPAD)2022年临床实践共识指南:儿童和青少年糖尿病教育》
Pediatr Diabetes. 2022 Dec;23(8):1229-1242. doi: 10.1111/pedi.13418.
4
Understanding adolescent and parent acceptability and feasibility experience in a large Type 1 diabetes mellitus behavioural trial.理解大型 1 型糖尿病行为试验中青少年和家长的可接受性和可行性经验。
Diabet Med. 2020 Jul;37(7):1134-1145. doi: 10.1111/dme.13913. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
5
Efficacy of the Flexible Lifestyles Empowering Change intervention on metabolic and psychosocial outcomes in adolescents with type 1 diabetes (FLEX): a randomised controlled trial.灵活生活方式赋能改变干预对 1 型糖尿病青少年代谢和心理社会结局的疗效(FLEX):一项随机对照试验。
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2018 Sep;2(9):635-646. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(18)30208-6. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
6
Design and development of a stepped-care behavioral intervention to support parents of young children newly diagnosed with type 1 diabetes.设计并开发一种逐步护理行为干预措施,以支持新诊断出1型糖尿病的幼儿的父母。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 Nov;62:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2017.08.009. Epub 2017 Aug 15.
7
Psycho-educational interventions for children and young people with Type 1 Diabetes in the UK: How effective are they? A systematic review and meta-analysis.英国针对1型糖尿病儿童和青少年的心理教育干预措施:其效果如何?一项系统综述与荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 30;12(6):e0179685. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179685. eCollection 2017.
8
Telemedicine for the Management of Glycemic Control and Clinical Outcomes of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies.远程医疗用于1型糖尿病血糖控制管理及临床结局:随机对照研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Pharmacol. 2017 May 30;8:330. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00330. eCollection 2017.
9
Impact of phone call intervention on glycemic control in diabetes patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials.电话干预对糖尿病患者血糖控制的影响:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 19;9(2):e89207. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089207. eCollection 2014.
10
Diabetes self-management education patterns in a US population-based cohort of youth with type 1 diabetes.美国一个基于人群的1型糖尿病青年队列中的糖尿病自我管理教育模式。
Diabetes Educ. 2014 Jan-Feb;40(1):29-39. doi: 10.1177/0145721713512156. Epub 2013 Nov 18.