Weinger Katie, Beverly Elizabeth A, Lee Yishan, Sitnokov Lilya, Ganda Om P, Caballero A Enrique
Behavioral Health and Outcomes Research, Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Arch Intern Med. 2011 Dec 12;171(22):1990-9. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.502. Epub 2011 Oct 10.
Although maintaining nearly normal glycemia delays onset and slows progression of diabetes complications, many patients with diabetes and their physicians struggle to achieve glycemic targets. The best methods to support patients as they follow diabetes prescriptions and recommendations are unclear.
To test the efficacy of a behavioral diabetes intervention in improving glycemia in long-duration, poorly controlled diabetes, we randomized 222 adults with diabetes (49% type 1) (mean [SD] age, 53 [12] years; mean [SD] disease duration 18 [12] years; mean [SD] hemoglobin A(1c) [HbA(1c)] concentration, 9.0% [1.1%]) to attend (1) a 5-session manual-based, educator-led structured group intervention with cognitive behavioral strategies (structured behavioral arm); (2) an educator-led attention control group education program (group attention control); or (3) unlimited individual nurse and dietitian education sessions for 6 months (individual control). Outcomes were baseline and 3-, 6-, and 12-month postintervention HbA(1c) levels (primary) and frequency of diabetes self-care, 3-day pedometer readings, 24-hour diet recalls, average number of glucose checks, physical fitness, depression, coping style, self-efficacy, and quality of life (secondary).
Linear mixed modeling found that all groups showed improved HbA(1c) levels (P < .001). However, the structured behavioral arm showed greater improvements than the group and individual control arms (3-month HbA(1c) concentration changes: -0.8% vs -0.4% and -0.4%, respectively (P = .04 for group × time interaction). Furthermore, participants with type 2 disease showed greater improvement than those with type 1 (P = .04 for type of diabetes × time interaction). Quality of life, glucose monitoring, and frequency of diabetes self-care did not differ by intervention over time.
A structured, cognitive behavioral program is more effective than 2 control interventions in improving glycemia in adults with long-duration diabetes. Educators can successfully use modified psychological and behavioral strategies.
clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT000142922.
尽管维持血糖接近正常水平可延缓糖尿病并发症的发生并减缓其进展,但许多糖尿病患者及其医生在实现血糖目标方面仍面临困难。目前尚不清楚在患者遵循糖尿病治疗方案和建议时,哪种方法最能提供支持。
为了测试行为糖尿病干预措施对改善长期血糖控制不佳的糖尿病患者血糖水平的疗效,我们将222名成年糖尿病患者(49%为1型糖尿病)(平均[标准差]年龄53[12]岁;平均[标准差]病程18[12]年;平均[标准差]糖化血红蛋白[HbA(1c)]浓度9.0%[1.1%])随机分组,分别参加:(1)为期5节、基于手册、由教育工作者主导的结构化小组干预,采用认知行为策略(结构化行为组);(2)由教育工作者主导的注意力控制组教育项目(小组注意力控制组);或(3)为期6个月的不限次数的个体护士和营养师教育课程(个体控制组)。观察指标包括基线及干预后3个月、6个月和12个月的HbA(1c)水平(主要指标),以及糖尿病自我管理频率、3天计步器读数、24小时饮食回顾、平均血糖检测次数、身体素质、抑郁程度、应对方式、自我效能感和生活质量(次要指标)。
线性混合模型分析发现,所有组的HbA(1c)水平均有所改善(P <.001)。然而,结构化行为组的改善程度大于小组和个体控制组(3个月时HbA(1c)浓度变化:分别为-0.8%、-0.4%和-0.4%(组间×时间交互作用P =.04)。此外,2型糖尿病患者的改善程度大于1型糖尿病患者(糖尿病类型×时间交互作用P =.04)。生活质量、血糖监测和糖尿病自我管理频率在不同干预组之间随时间变化无差异。
在改善长期糖尿病成年患者血糖水平方面,结构化认知行为项目比两种对照干预措施更有效。教育工作者可以成功地运用改良的心理和行为策略。
clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT000142922