Levy Steven M, Hillis Stephen L, Warren John J, Broffitt Barbara A, Mahbubul Islam A K M, Wefel James S, Kanellis Michael J
Department of Preventive and Community Dentistry, University of Iowa College of Dentistry, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2002 Aug;30(4):286-95. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0528.2002.00053.x.
Few studies in North America have assessed dental fluorosis of the primary dentition and few, if any, anywhere have assessed the relative importance in fluorosis etiology of fluoride intake during different time periods or from multiple sources. The purpose of this paper is to report on analyses relating estimated prenatal fluoride intake and fluoride intake during different parts of the first year of life to primary tooth fluorosis.
As part of The Iowa Fluoride Study, subjects were recruited at birth and studied longitudinally. Trained examiners assessed dental fluorosis for children aged 4-7 years using the Tooth Surface Index of Fluorosis (TSIF) adapted for the primary dentition. Detailed parent questionnaires at childbirth were used to estimate prenatal fluoride intake and questionnaires sent at 6 weeks and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months were used to estimate fluoride intake during the first year of life (combined fluoride intake from water, food and beverage, supplements, and dentifrice). There were 504 children with prenatal and at least four of the five postnatal responses with complete data.
Fluorosis prevalence was 12.1%, occurring primarily on the second primary molars. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and logistic regression were used to assess the importance of different time periods' fluoride intake. In bivariate analyses, fluoride intake during each time interval was individually significantly related to fluorosis occurrence. For multivariate analyses, the period from 6 to 9 months was most important individually (P = 0.0001), and no other period was jointly statistically significant.
Results suggest that the middle of the first year of life is most important in fluorosis etiology for the primary dentition in this setting.
北美地区很少有研究评估乳牙的氟斑牙情况,而且在其他任何地方,几乎没有研究评估不同时间段或多种来源的氟摄入在氟斑牙病因学中的相对重要性。本文的目的是报告关于估计的产前氟摄入量以及出生后第一年不同时期的氟摄入量与乳牙氟斑牙之间关系的分析。
作为爱荷华氟研究的一部分,研究对象在出生时被招募并进行纵向研究。经过培训的检查人员使用适用于乳牙的氟斑牙表面指数(TSIF)对4至7岁儿童的氟斑牙情况进行评估。分娩时详细的家长问卷用于估计产前氟摄入量,在6周以及3、6、9和12个月时发送的问卷用于估计出生后第一年的氟摄入量(来自水、食物和饮料、补充剂以及牙膏的氟摄入量总和)。有504名儿童有产前数据以及至少五个产后数据中的四个且数据完整。
氟斑牙患病率为12.1%,主要发生在第二乳磨牙上。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线和逻辑回归来评估不同时间段氟摄入的重要性。在双变量分析中,每个时间间隔的氟摄入量均与氟斑牙的发生单独显著相关。在多变量分析中,6至9个月期间单独来看最为重要(P = 0.0001),没有其他时间段在联合分析中具有统计学意义。
结果表明,在这种情况下,出生后第一年的中期在乳牙氟斑牙病因学中最为重要。