Bojórquez-Tapia Luis A, Juárez Lourdes, Cruz-Bello Gustavo
School of Renewable Natural Resources, Biological Science East, Room 207, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA.
Environ Manage. 2002 Sep;30(3):418-33. doi: 10.1007/s00267-002-2655-1.
Appraisal of ecological impacts has been problematic because of the behavior of ecological system and the responses of these systems to human intervention are far from fully understood. While it has been relatively easy to itemize the potential ecological impacts, it has been difficult to arrive at accurate predictions of how these impacts affect populations, communities, or ecosystems. Furthermore, the spatial heterogeneity of ecological systems has been overlooked because its examination is practically impossible through matrix techniques, the most commonly used impact assessment approach. Besides, the public has become increasingly aware of the importance of the EIA in decision-making and thus the interpretation of impact significance is complicated further by the different value judgments of stakeholders. Moreover, impact assessments are carried out with a minimum of data, high uncertainty, and poor conceptual understanding. Hence, the evaluation of ecological impacts entails the integration of subjective and often conflicting judgments from a variety of experts and stakeholders. The purpose of this paper is to present an environmental impact assessment approach based on the integration fuzzy logic, geographical information systems and optimization techniques. This approach enables environmental analysts to deal with the intrinsic imprecision and ambiguity associated with the judgments of experts and stakeholders, the description of ecological systems, and the prediction of ecological impacts. The application of this approach is illustrated through an example, which shows how consensus about impact mitigation can be attained within a conflict resolution framework.
由于生态系统的行为以及这些系统对人类干预的反应远未得到充分理解,生态影响评估一直存在问题。虽然列出潜在的生态影响相对容易,但要准确预测这些影响如何影响种群、群落或生态系统却很困难。此外,生态系统的空间异质性被忽视了,因为通过矩阵技术(最常用的影响评估方法)实际上无法对其进行考察。此外,公众越来越意识到环境影响评估在决策中的重要性,因此利益相关者的不同价值判断进一步 complicate 了对影响重要性的解释。此外,影响评估是在数据最少、不确定性高和概念理解不足的情况下进行的。因此,生态影响评估需要整合来自各种专家和利益相关者的主观且往往相互冲突的判断。本文的目的是提出一种基于模糊逻辑、地理信息系统和优化技术整合的环境影响评估方法。这种方法使环境分析师能够处理与专家和利益相关者的判断、生态系统的描述以及生态影响的预测相关的内在不精确性和模糊性。通过一个例子说明了这种方法的应用,该例子展示了如何在冲突解决框架内就影响缓解达成共识。