García Del Blanco N, Dobson M E, Vela A I, De La Puente V A, Gutiérrez C B, Hadfield T L, Kuhnert P, Frey J, Domínguez L, Rodríguez Ferri E F
Section of Microbiology and Immunology, Department of Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, León, Spain.
J Clin Microbiol. 2002 Aug;40(8):2964-72. doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.8.2964-2972.2002.
We evaluated three molecular methods for identification of Francisella strains: pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) analysis, and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The analysis was performed with 54 Francisella tularensis subsp. holarctica, 5 F. tularensis subsp. tularensis, 2 F. tularensis subsp. novicida, and 1 F. philomiragia strains. On the basis of the combination of results obtained by PFGE with the restriction enzymes XhoI and BamHI, PFGE revealed seven pulsotypes, which allowed us to discriminate the strains to the subspecies level and which even allowed us to discriminate among some isolates of F. tularensis subsp. holarctica. The AFLP analysis technique produced some degree of discrimination among F. tularensis subsp. holarctica strains (one primary cluster with three major subclusters and minor variations within subclusters) when EcoRI-C and MseI-A, EcoRI-T and MseI-T, EcoRI-A and MseI-C, and EcoRI-0 and MseI-CA were used as primers. The degree of similarity among the strains was about 94%. The percent similarities of the AFLP profiles of this subspecies compared to those of F. tularensis subsp. tularensis, F. tularensis subsp. novicida, and F. philomiragia were less than 90%, about 72%, and less than 24%, respectively, thus permitting easy differentiation of this subspecies. 16S rRNA gene sequencing revealed 100% similarity for all F. tularensis subsp. holarctica isolates compared in this study. These results suggest that although limited genetic heterogeneity among F. tularensis subsp. holarctica isolates was observed, PFGE and AFLP analysis appear to be promising tools for the diagnosis of infections caused by different subspecies of F. tularensis and suitable techniques for the differentiation of individual strains.
脉冲场凝胶电泳(PFGE)、扩增片段长度多态性(AFLP)分析和16S rRNA基因测序。分析使用了54株全北区土拉弗朗西斯菌亚种、5株土拉弗朗西斯菌亚种、2株新凶手土拉弗朗西斯菌亚种和1株嗜肺弗朗西斯菌菌株。基于PFGE与限制性内切酶XhoI和BamHI所得结果的组合,PFGE显示出七种脉冲型,这使我们能够将菌株区分到亚种水平,甚至能够区分一些全北区土拉弗朗西斯菌亚种的分离株。当使用EcoRI-C和MseI-A、EcoRI-T和MseI-T、EcoRI-A和MseI-C以及EcoRI-0和MseI-CA作为引物时,AFLP分析技术在全北区土拉弗朗西斯菌亚种菌株之间产生了一定程度的区分(一个主要聚类有三个主要亚聚类,亚聚类内有微小变异)。菌株之间的相似程度约为94%。该亚种的AFLP图谱与土拉弗朗西斯菌亚种、新凶手土拉弗朗西斯菌亚种和嗜肺弗朗西斯菌的AFLP图谱的相似百分比分别小于90%、约72%和小于24%,从而便于区分该亚种。在本研究中比较的所有全北区土拉弗朗西斯菌亚种分离株的16S rRNA基因测序显示出100%的相似性。这些结果表明,尽管在全北区土拉弗朗西斯菌亚种分离株中观察到有限的遗传异质性,但PFGE和AFLP分析似乎是诊断由不同土拉弗朗西斯菌亚种引起的感染的有前景的工具,也是区分单个菌株的合适技术。