Broekhuijsen Martien, Larsson Pär, Johansson Anders, Byström Mona, Eriksson Ulla, Larsson Eva, Prior Richard G, Sjöstedt Anders, Titball Richard W, Forsman Mats
TNO Prins Maurits Laboratory, Rijswijk, The Netherlands.
J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Jul;41(7):2924-31. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.7.2924-2931.2003.
Francisella tularensis is a potent pathogen and a possible bioterrorism agent. Little is known, however, to explain the molecular basis for its virulence and the distinct differences in virulence found between the four recognized subspecies, F. tularensis subsp. tularensis, F. tularensis subsp. mediasiatica, F. tularensis subsp. holarctica, and F. tularensis subsp. novicida. We developed a DNA microarray based on 1,832 clones from a shotgun library used for sequencing of the highly virulent strain F. tularensis subsp. tularensis Schu S4. This allowed a genome-wide analysis of 27 strains representing all four subspecies. Overall, the microarray analysis confirmed a limited genetic variation within the species F. tularensis, and when the strains were compared, at most 3.7% of the probes showed differential hybridization. Cluster analysis of the hybridization data revealed that the causative agents of type A and type B tularemia, i.e., F. tularensis subsp. tularensis and F. tularensis subsp. holarctica, respectively, formed distinct clusters. Despite marked differences in their virulence and geographical origin, a high degree of genomic similarity between strains of F. tularensis subsp. tularensis and F. tularensis subsp. mediasiatica was apparent. Strains from Japan clustered separately, as did strains of F. tularensis subsp. novicida. Eight regions of difference (RD) 0.6 to 11.5 kb in size, altogether comprising 21 open reading frames, were identified that distinguished strains of the moderately virulent subspecies F. tularensis subsp. holarctica and the highly virulent subspecies F. tularensis subsp. tularensis. One of these regions, RD1, allowed for the first time the development of an F. tularensis-specific PCR assay that discriminates each of the four subspecies.
土拉弗朗西斯菌是一种强致病菌,也是一种可能的生物恐怖主义制剂。然而,对于其毒力的分子基础以及在四个公认亚种(土拉弗朗西斯菌土拉亚种、土拉弗朗西斯菌中亚细亚亚种、土拉弗朗西斯菌全北区亚种和土拉弗朗西斯菌新凶手亚种)之间发现的毒力明显差异,人们知之甚少。我们基于来自用于对高毒力菌株土拉弗朗西斯菌土拉亚种Schu S4进行测序的鸟枪法文库的1832个克隆构建了一个DNA微阵列。这使得能够对代表所有四个亚种的27个菌株进行全基因组分析。总体而言,微阵列分析证实土拉弗朗西斯菌物种内的遗传变异有限,当对这些菌株进行比较时,最多3.7%的探针显示出差异杂交。杂交数据的聚类分析表明,A 型和 B 型兔热病的病原体,即土拉弗朗西斯菌土拉亚种和土拉弗朗西斯菌全北区亚种,分别形成了不同的聚类。尽管土拉弗朗西斯菌土拉亚种和土拉弗朗西斯菌中亚细亚亚种的菌株在毒力和地理起源上存在明显差异,但它们之间的基因组相似性很高。来自日本的菌株单独聚类,土拉弗朗西斯菌新凶手亚种的菌株也是如此。确定了8个大小在0.6至11.5 kb之间的差异区域(RD),总共包含21个开放阅读框,这些区域区分了中等毒力的土拉弗朗西斯菌全北区亚种和高毒力的土拉弗朗西斯菌土拉亚种的菌株。其中一个区域RD1首次使得能够开发一种区分四个亚种中每一个的土拉弗朗西斯菌特异性PCR检测方法。