Tonbul Z, Altintepe L, Sözlü C, Yeksan M, Yildiz A, Türk S
Selcuk University Medical School, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Konya, Turkey.
J Hum Hypertens. 2002 Aug;16(8):585-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001449.
The aim of this study was to compare the results of the 44-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) data between haemodialysis (HDp) and CAPD patients and to investigate the relation of circadian rhythm in blood pressure (BP) with development of left ventricular hypertrophy. Twenty-two HDp (11 male, 11 female, mean age: 50 +/- 17 years) and 24 CAPDp (11 male, 13 female, mean age: 47 +/- 15 years) were included. Echocardiographic measurements and ABPM were performed in all study groups. ABPM of the first and second days were analysed separately and compared with CAPDp. Left ventricular hypertrophy was detected in 17 of the 22 HDp (77%) and 17 of the 24 CAPDp (71%). There was no significant differences between HD and CAPDp in respect to 44-h, daytime and night-time systolic and diastolic BP values. Although the course of BP in CAPDp was stable during the 44-h period, systolic and diastolic BP levels on the second day were significantly higher than those of on the first day in HDp (P < 0.001 for both). Daytime systolic and diastolic BP levels on the first day in HD group were recorded lower than those of the CAPD group. On the second day, night-time BP readings (both systolic and diastolic BP) were measured significantly higher in the HD group compared with the CAPD group. Twenty-one of the 24 (88%) CAPD patients were dippers, whereas only four of the 22 (18%) HDp were dippers (P < 0.001). Dipper patients had significantly lower left ventricular mass index (LVMI) than non-dipper patients (131 +/- 29 g/m(2) vs 153 +/- 40 g/m(2), P = 0.03). In 44-h ABPM, there were no differences in daytime and night-time systolic and diastolic blood pressures between HD and CAPD patients. Non-dipper patients had increased LVMI as compared with dipper patients. Abnormalities in circadian rhythm of the blood pressure might be one of the implicated factors for development of left ventricular hypertrophy.
本研究旨在比较血液透析(HDp)患者和持续性非卧床腹膜透析(CAPD)患者44小时动态血压监测(ABPM)数据的结果,并研究血压昼夜节律与左心室肥厚发展之间的关系。研究纳入了22例血液透析患者(11例男性,11例女性,平均年龄:50±17岁)和24例持续性非卧床腹膜透析患者(11例男性,13例女性,平均年龄:47±15岁)。对所有研究组进行了超声心动图测量和动态血压监测。分别分析了第一天和第二天的动态血压监测数据,并与持续性非卧床腹膜透析患者进行比较。22例血液透析患者中有17例(77%)检测到左心室肥厚,24例持续性非卧床腹膜透析患者中有17例(71%)检测到左心室肥厚。血液透析患者和持续性非卧床腹膜透析患者在44小时、白天和夜间的收缩压和舒张压值方面没有显著差异。尽管持续性非卧床腹膜透析患者的血压在44小时内较为稳定,但血液透析患者第二天的收缩压和舒张压水平显著高于第一天(两者P均<0.001)。血液透析组第一天的白天收缩压和舒张压水平低于持续性非卧床腹膜透析组。第二天,血液透析组的夜间血压读数(收缩压和舒张压)显著高于持续性非卧床腹膜透析组。24例持续性非卧床腹膜透析患者中有21例(88%)为杓型血压者,而22例血液透析患者中只有4例(18%)为杓型血压者(P<0.001)。杓型血压患者的左心室质量指数(LVMI)显著低于非杓型血压患者(131±29g/m²对153±40g/m²,P=0.03)。在44小时动态血压监测中,血液透析患者和持续性非卧床腹膜透析患者在白天和夜间的收缩压和舒张压方面没有差异。与杓型血压患者相比,非杓型血压患者的左心室质量指数增加。血压昼夜节律异常可能是左心室肥厚发展的相关因素之一。