Ataş Nuh, Erten Yasemin, Okyay Gülay Ulusal, Inal Salih, Topal Salih, Öneç Kürşad, Akyel Ahmet, Çelik Bülent, Tavil Yusuf, Bali Musa, Arınsoy Turgay
Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
Ther Apher Dial. 2014 Jun;18(3):297-304. doi: 10.1111/1744-9987.12104.
Hypertension, non-dipper blood pressure (BP) pattern and decrease in daily urine output have been associated with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. However, there is lack of data regarding the impact of different PD regimens on these factors. We aimed to investigate the impact of circadian rhythm of BP on LVH in end-stage renal disease patients using automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) or continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) modalities. Twenty APD (7 men, 13 women) and 28 CAPD (16 men, 12 women) patients were included into the study. 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and transthoracic echocardiography besides routine blood examinations were performed. Two groups were compared with each other for ABPM measurements, BP loads, dipping patterns, left ventricular mass index (LVMI) and daily urine output. Mean systolic and diastolic BP measurements, BP loads, LVMI, residual renal function (RRF) and percentage of non-dippers were found to be similar for the two groups. There were positive correlations of LVMI with BP measurements and BP loads. LVMI was found to be significantly higher in diastolic non-dippers compared to dippers (140.4 ± 35.3 vs 114.5 ± 29.7, respectively, P = 0.02). RRF and BP were found to be independent predictors of LVMI. Non-dipping BP pattern was a frequent finding among all PD patients without an inter-group difference. Additionally, higher BP measurements, decrease in daily urine output and non-dipper diastolic BP pattern were associated with LVMI. In order to avoid LVH, besides correction of anemia and volume control, circadian BP variability and diastolic dipping should also be taken into consideration in PD patients.
高血压、血压非勺型模式以及每日尿量减少与腹膜透析(PD)患者的左心室肥厚(LVH)相关。然而,关于不同PD治疗方案对这些因素的影响,目前缺乏相关数据。我们旨在研究使用自动化腹膜透析(APD)或持续性非卧床腹膜透析(CAPD)模式的终末期肾病患者中,血压昼夜节律对LVH的影响。本研究纳入了20例APD患者(7例男性,13例女性)和28例CAPD患者(16例男性,12例女性)。除常规血液检查外,还进行了24小时动态血压监测(ABPM)和经胸超声心动图检查。对两组患者的ABPM测量值、血压负荷、勺型模式、左心室质量指数(LVMI)和每日尿量进行了比较。结果发现,两组患者的平均收缩压和舒张压测量值、血压负荷、LVMI、残余肾功能(RRF)以及非勺型患者的百分比相似。LVMI与血压测量值和血压负荷呈正相关。与勺型患者相比,舒张期非勺型患者的LVMI显著更高(分别为140.4±35.3和114.5±29.7,P = 0.02)。RRF和血压是LVMI的独立预测因素。非勺型血压模式在所有PD患者中较为常见,两组之间无差异。此外,较高的血压测量值、每日尿量减少和舒张期非勺型血压模式与LVMI相关。为避免LVH,除纠正贫血和控制容量外,PD患者还应考虑昼夜血压变异性和舒张期勺型情况。