Eren Mehmet, Eksik Abdurrahman, Gorgulu Sevket, Norgaz Tugrul, Dagdeviren Bahadir, Bolca Osman, Tezel Tuna
Siyami Ersek Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Center, Cardiology Department, Istanbul, Turkey.
J Heart Valve Dis. 2002 Jul;11(4):567-75.
Recent studies evaluating the severity of valvular insufficiencies have focused on the effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA), which corresponds hydrodynamically to the cross-sectional area of the vena contracta (VC). The study aim was to quantify aortic regurgitation (AR) by using color Doppler imaging of the VC.
Fifty-five patients with chronic AR were enrolled into the study. VC was visualized by transthoracic echocardiography from the apical echocardiographic window. The quantitative Doppler (QD) method, depending on mitral and aortic stroke volumes, was taken as a reference method. EROA, regurgitant volume (RV) and regurgitant fraction (RF) were calculated using both VC and QD simultaneously in all patients, and the results obtained with each method were compared.
EROA(QD) (r = 0.96), RFQD (r = 0.84), RVQD (r = 0.82), and AR grade 3+ or 4+ (r = 0.74) were statistically significantly correlated with VC (4.8+/-1.2 mm). In the multivariate analysis, VC was related only to EROA(QD). The EROA (r = 0.96, p <0.001; mean difference 0+/-0.03 cm2, SEE = 0.004 and p >0.05), RV (r = 0.97, p <0.001; mean difference =1.3+/-4.8 cm3, SEE = 0.65 cm3 and p >0.05) and RF (r = 0.93, p <0.001; mean difference = 1.46+/-4.9%, SEE = 0.66% and p >0.05) obtained by both methods agreed well with each other. VC had a sensitivity of 80%, a specificity of 86%, and an accuracy of 84% in determining severe AR for VC > or =5.5 mm.
The vena contracta can be visualized using a transthoracic approach from the apical window. The severity of AR can be evaluated using the VC width itself, and also in combination with Doppler data.
近期评估瓣膜反流严重程度的研究主要聚焦于有效反流口面积(EROA),其在流体动力学上与缩流颈(VC)的横截面积相对应。本研究的目的是通过对缩流颈进行彩色多普勒成像来量化主动脉瓣反流(AR)。
55例慢性主动脉瓣反流患者纳入本研究。通过经胸超声心动图从心尖超声心动图窗口观察缩流颈。将依赖于二尖瓣和主动脉搏出量的定量多普勒(QD)方法作为参考方法。在所有患者中同时使用缩流颈和QD方法计算有效反流口面积、反流容积(RV)和反流分数(RF),并比较两种方法所得结果。
有效反流口面积(QD)(r = 0.96)、反流分数(QD)(r = 0.84)、反流容积(QD)(r = 0.82)以及3 +或4 +级主动脉瓣反流(r = 0.74)与缩流颈(4.8±1.2 mm)在统计学上显著相关。在多变量分析中,缩流颈仅与有效反流口面积(QD)相关。两种方法所得的有效反流口面积(r = 0.96,p <0.001;平均差异0±0.03 cm²,标准估计误差 = 0.004且p>0.05)、反流容积(r = 0.97,p <0.001;平均差异 = 1.3±4.8 cm³,标准估计误差 = 0.65 cm³且p>0.05)和反流分数(r = 0.93,p <0.001;平均差异 = 1.46±4.9%,标准估计误差 = 0.66%且p>0.05)彼此吻合良好。对于缩流颈≥5.5 mm,缩流颈在判定严重主动脉瓣反流时的敏感性为80%,特异性为86%,准确性为84%。
缩流颈可通过经胸途径从心尖窗口进行观察。主动脉瓣反流的严重程度可使用缩流颈宽度本身进行评估,也可结合多普勒数据进行评估。