Suppr超能文献

子宫肌瘤的微创管理

Minimally invasive management of uterine fibroids.

作者信息

Falcone Tommaso, Bedaiwy Mohamed A

机构信息

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA.

出版信息

Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Aug;14(4):401-7. doi: 10.1097/00001703-200208000-00007.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Many minimally invasive techniques have recently been introduced for the management of uterine fibroids. The purpose of this review is to analyse recent data for techniques that are used to manage uterine fibroids.

RECENT FINDINGS

Laparoscopic myomectomy has provided a minimally invasive alternative to laparotomy for intramural and subserous myomata. However, this technique is still the subject of debate. With good surgical experience, the risk of perioperative complications is comparable with conventional surgery. Laparoscopic myomectomy is associated with faster postoperative recovery, and could potentially reduce the risk of postoperative adhesions compared with laparotomy. Spontaneous uterine rupture, although uncommon after laparoscopic myomectomy, is still a concern. The risk of recurrence seems to be higher after laparoscopic myomectomy than after myomectomy performed by laparotomy. Uterine artery embolization is another new and attractive treatment for patients with symptomatic fibroids. Uterine artery embolization provides excellent relief for abnormal bleeding, pelvic pain, and bulk-related symptoms. Early reports show that uterine artery embolization is associated with normal reproductive and obstetric functions. This technique is associated with a shorter hospital stay and a rapid recovery time.

SUMMARY

Laparoscopic myomectomy and uterine artery embolization are being performed more than ever. Current evidence proves the safety, reliability and reproducibility of both procedures. However, prospective randomized controlled trials comparing both procedures with conventional myomectomy are needed.

摘要

综述目的

最近已引入多种微创技术来治疗子宫肌瘤。本综述的目的是分析用于治疗子宫肌瘤的技术的最新数据。

最新发现

腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术为壁间肌瘤和浆膜下肌瘤提供了一种替代剖腹手术的微创方法。然而,这项技术仍存在争议。具备良好的手术经验时,围手术期并发症的风险与传统手术相当。腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术与术后恢复更快相关,与剖腹手术相比,可能会降低术后粘连的风险。尽管腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术后自发性子宫破裂并不常见,但仍是一个令人担忧的问题。腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术后的复发风险似乎高于剖腹子宫肌瘤切除术。子宫动脉栓塞术是另一种针对有症状子宫肌瘤患者的新型且有吸引力的治疗方法。子宫动脉栓塞术能有效缓解异常出血、盆腔疼痛和与肿块相关的症状。早期报告显示,子宫动脉栓塞术与正常的生殖和产科功能相关。该技术与住院时间缩短和恢复时间快速相关。

总结

腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术和子宫动脉栓塞术的实施比以往任何时候都多。目前的证据证明了这两种手术的安全性、可靠性和可重复性。然而,需要进行前瞻性随机对照试验,将这两种手术与传统子宫肌瘤切除术进行比较。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验