• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国子宫肌瘤的年度经济负担(2010年与2022年对比):一项成本比较分析

The Annual Economic Burden of Uterine Fibroids in the United States (2010 Versus 2022): A Comparative Cost-Analysis.

作者信息

Hazimeh Dana, Coco Abigail, Casubhoy Imaima, Segars James, Singh Bhuchitra

机构信息

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Reproductive Sciences & Women's Health Research, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.

Division of Reproductive Sciences & Women's Health Research, Department of Gynecology & Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 720 Rutland Avenue Ross Research Building, Room 624, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.

出版信息

Reprod Sci. 2024 Dec;31(12):3743-3756. doi: 10.1007/s43032-024-01727-0. Epub 2024 Oct 25.

DOI:10.1007/s43032-024-01727-0
PMID:39455488
Abstract

In 2010, the estimated annual cost of uterine fibroids in the United States ranged from 5.9 to 34.4 billion USD. In the past decade, more uterine-sparing and fertility preserving interventions have become available to treat symptomatic fibroids. This comparative cost-analysis aims to evaluate change in societal costs of uterine fibroids in the US between 2010 and 2022 given changing fibroid and obstetric management, population growth, and inflation. A systematic review was conducted to update uterine fibroid, treatment, and obstetric complication prevalence, direct costs of medical and surgical interventions, indirect productivity costs, and obstetric costs attributable to fibroids in 2022. A comparative cost-analysis with paired t-tests was performed using baseline data published in 2010. Percent (%) changes between 2010 and 2022 were reported. NIH research funding for fibroids and other common diseases was compared. All costs were converted to 2023 USD. The number of US women with uterine fibroids increased by 10.6% from 2010 to 2022. Over this period, the economic burden of uterine fibroids increased up to 41.4 billion USD compared to 34.4 billion USD in 2010. Overall costs increased to 42.2 billion USD after incorporating new costs associated with MRgFUS and infertility. Direct costs of medical management decreased while costs of surgical interventions increased as a result of evolving treatment-seeking behavior. Lost work costs continue to account for the largest proportion of the economic burden for fibroids. Cesarean section delivery remains the largest contributor (average 80.0%) to indirect obstetrical costs. Despite the rise in the number of individuals affected by uterine fibroids and its sizable annual cost to society, uterine fibroids research continues to be underfunded.

摘要

2010年,美国子宫肌瘤的年度估计成本在59亿至344亿美元之间。在过去十年中,出现了更多保留子宫和保留生育功能的干预措施来治疗有症状的肌瘤。这项比较成本分析旨在评估2010年至2022年期间,鉴于肌瘤和产科管理的变化、人口增长以及通货膨胀,美国子宫肌瘤的社会成本变化。进行了一项系统综述,以更新2022年子宫肌瘤、治疗方法和产科并发症的患病率、医疗和手术干预的直接成本、间接生产力成本以及归因于肌瘤的产科成本。使用2010年公布的基线数据进行了配对t检验的比较成本分析。报告了2010年至2022年期间的百分比(%)变化。比较了美国国立卫生研究院对肌瘤和其他常见疾病的研究资金。所有成本均换算为2023年美元。从2010年到2022年,美国患有子宫肌瘤的女性人数增加了10.6%。在此期间,子宫肌瘤的经济负担增加到414亿美元,而2010年为344亿美元。纳入与磁共振引导聚焦超声治疗(MRgFUS)和不孕症相关的新成本后,总成本增至422亿美元。由于寻求治疗行为的演变,医疗管理的直接成本下降,而手术干预的成本增加。误工成本在肌瘤的经济负担中仍占最大比例。剖宫产仍然是间接产科成本的最大贡献者(平均80.0%)。尽管受子宫肌瘤影响的人数有所增加,且其每年给社会带来相当大的成本,但子宫肌瘤研究的资金仍然不足。

相似文献

1
The Annual Economic Burden of Uterine Fibroids in the United States (2010 Versus 2022): A Comparative Cost-Analysis.美国子宫肌瘤的年度经济负担(2010年与2022年对比):一项成本比较分析
Reprod Sci. 2024 Dec;31(12):3743-3756. doi: 10.1007/s43032-024-01727-0. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
2
The estimated annual cost of uterine leiomyomata in the United States.估计美国子宫平滑肌瘤的年度成本。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Mar;206(3):211.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.12.002. Epub 2011 Dec 11.
3
The economic impact of uterine fibroids in the United States: a summary of published estimates.美国子宫肌瘤的经济影响:已发表估算综述
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2005 Oct;14(8):692-703. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2005.14.692.
4
The direct and indirect costs of uterine fibroid tumors: a systematic review of the literature between 2000 and 2013.子宫肌瘤的直接和间接成本:对2000年至2013年文献的系统综述
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Aug;213(2):141-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.03.019. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
5
The management of uterine leiomyomas.子宫平滑肌瘤的管理
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Feb;37(2):157-178. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30338-8.
6
Economic evaluation of uterine artery embolization versus hysterectomy in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids: results from the randomized EMMY trial.子宫动脉栓塞术与子宫切除术治疗有症状子宫肌瘤的经济学评价:随机EMMY试验结果
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008 Jul;19(7):1007-16; quiz 1017. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2008.03.001.
7
The management of uterine fibroids in women with otherwise unexplained infertility.患有不明原因不孕症的女性子宫肌瘤的管理。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Mar;37(3):277-285. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30318-2.
8
A multi-centre retrospective cohort study comparing the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of hysterectomy and uterine artery embolisation for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids. The HOPEFUL study.一项多中心回顾性队列研究,比较子宫切除术和子宫动脉栓塞术治疗有症状子宫肌瘤的疗效、安全性和成本效益。HOPEFUL研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Mar;12(5):1-248, iii. doi: 10.3310/hta12050.
9
Management of uterine fibroids: an update of the evidence.子宫肌瘤的管理:证据更新
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2007 Jul(154):1-122.
10
Healthcare resource utilization and costs among women diagnosed with uterine fibroids compared to women without uterine fibroids.与没有子宫肌瘤的女性相比,诊断为子宫肌瘤的女性的医疗资源利用和成本。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2019 Nov;35(11):1925-1935. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2019.1642186. Epub 2019 Aug 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Uncovering the Cellular and Molecular Landscape of Gynecological Disorders.揭示妇科疾病的细胞和分子图景。
Cells. 2025 Sep 8;14(17):1399. doi: 10.3390/cells14171399.

本文引用的文献

1
Racial disparities in uterine fibroids and endometriosis: a systematic review and application of social, structural, and political context.种族差异与子宫肌瘤和子宫内膜异位症:系统综述及社会、结构和政治背景的应用。
Fertil Steril. 2023 Mar;119(3):355-363. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.01.022. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
2
Evolution of healthcare costs for lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia.下尿路症状相关良性前列腺增生的医疗保健成本演变。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2022 Nov;54(11):2797-2803. doi: 10.1007/s11255-022-03296-0. Epub 2022 Jul 29.
3
Uterine fibroids increase the risk of preterm birth and other adverse birth events: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
子宫肌瘤增加早产及其他不良分娩事件的风险:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Transl Pediatr. 2022 Jun;11(6):978-986. doi: 10.21037/tp-22-215.
4
The risk of preterm birth in women with uterine fibroids: A systematic review and meta-analysis.子宫肌瘤患者的早产风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 2;17(6):e0269478. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269478. eCollection 2022.
5
Uterine Fibroids and Infertility.子宫肌瘤与不孕
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Aug 12;11(8):1455. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11081455.
6
Black Women's Psychosocial Experiences with Seeking Surgical Treatment for Uterine Fibroids: Implications for Clinical Practice.黑人女性寻求子宫肌瘤手术治疗的心理社会体验:对临床实践的启示。
Womens Health Issues. 2021 May-Jun;31(3):263-270. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2021.01.001. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
7
Preterm birth lifetime costs in the United States in 2016: An update.2016 年美国早产儿终生成本:更新。
Semin Perinatol. 2021 Apr;45(3):151390. doi: 10.1016/j.semperi.2021.151390. Epub 2021 Jan 24.
8
Utilization of Endovascular and Surgical Treatments for Symptomatic Uterine Leiomyomas: A Population Health Perspective.从人群健康角度看有症状子宫平滑肌瘤的血管内治疗和手术治疗的应用
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020 Oct;31(10):1552-1559.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2020.04.039. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
9
Contemporary treatment utilization among women diagnosed with symptomatic uterine fibroids in the United States.美国诊断为有症状的子宫肌瘤的女性的当代治疗利用情况。
BMC Womens Health. 2020 Aug 13;20(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12905-020-01005-6.
10
The CHOICES Study: Facility Level Comparative Cost, Resource Utilization, and Outcomes Analysis of Myomectomy Compared to Transcervical Fibroid Ablation.CHOICES研究:子宫肌瘤切除术与经宫颈子宫肌瘤消融术的机构层面成本比较、资源利用及结果分析
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2020 Jun 12;12:299-306. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S253891. eCollection 2020.