Goodstone N J, Hardingham T E
The Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell Matrix Research, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester M139PT, UK.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2002 Aug;41(8):883-91. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/41.8.883.
To compare the time- and concentration-dependent effects of tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) and interleukin 1beta (IL-1beta) on the induction of nitric oxide synthase (NOS), the production of nitric oxide (NO) and the expression of aggrecan and hyaluronan (HA) in chondrocytes.
Primary porcine articular chondrocytes were treated with recombinant human (rh) TNF-alpha or rhIL-1beta for up to 72 h. Culture supernatants were assayed for NO production. Synthesis of HA and aggrecan was determined by radiolabelling cultures with [(3)H]glucosamine and/or [(35)S]sulphate. Total RNA was isolated and the time courses of changes in gene expression of inducible NOS and HA synthase-2 were investigated by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction.
rhTNF-alpha stimulated more NO production than rhIL-1beta. It was also active at lower concentrations; rhTNF-alpha at 0.006 pM (100 pg/ml) was equivalent to rhIL-1beta at 0.29 pM (5000 pg/ml). The time course of induction was transient and slower at low concentrations. Contrary to previous reports, rhTNF-alpha and rhIL-1beta were of similar potency in the inhibition of aggrecan synthesis. In contrast, both cytokines stimulated HA synthesis, and this was correlated with the transient induction of HA synthase-2. An inhibitor of inducible NOS relieved the inhibition of aggrecan synthesis caused by both cytokines at low concentrations, but it showed little effect on HA synthesis.
At low concentrations, rhTNF-alpha was 50 times more potent than rhIL-1beta in stimulating NO production by chondrocytes and it was of similar potency in inhibiting aggrecan synthesis and in stimulating HA synthesis. Inhibition of inducible NOS activity relieved some of the effects on aggrecan synthesis, showing that part of the action of TNF-alpha is mediated through NO. HA synthesis was not affected.
比较肿瘤坏死因子α(TNF-α)和白细胞介素1β(IL-1β)对软骨细胞中一氧化氮合酶(NOS)诱导、一氧化氮(NO)产生以及聚集蛋白聚糖和透明质酸(HA)表达的时间和浓度依赖性影响。
用重组人(rh)TNF-α或rhIL-1β处理原代猪关节软骨细胞长达72小时。检测培养上清液中的NO产生。通过用[³H]葡萄糖胺和/或[³⁵S]硫酸盐对培养物进行放射性标记来测定HA和聚集蛋白聚糖的合成。分离总RNA,通过逆转录-聚合酶链反应研究诱导型NOS和HA合酶-2基因表达的时间变化过程。
rhTNF-α比rhIL-1β刺激产生更多的NO。它在较低浓度时也有活性;0.006 pM(100 pg/ml)的rhTNF-α相当于0.29 pM(5000 pg/ml)的rhIL-1β。诱导的时间过程是短暂的,在低浓度时较慢。与先前的报道相反,rhTNF-α和rhIL-1β在抑制聚集蛋白聚糖合成方面具有相似的效力。相比之下,两种细胞因子都刺激HA合成,这与HA合酶-2的短暂诱导相关。诱导型NOS抑制剂可缓解两种细胞因子在低浓度时对聚集蛋白聚糖合成的抑制,但对HA合成几乎没有影响。
在低浓度下,rhTNF-α刺激软骨细胞产生NO的效力比rhIL-1β高50倍,在抑制聚集蛋白聚糖合成和刺激HA合成方面具有相似的效力。抑制诱导型NOS活性可减轻对聚集蛋白聚糖合成的部分影响,表明TNF-α的部分作用是通过NO介导的。HA合成不受影响。