Branski Ryan C, Bhattacharyya Neil, Shapiro Jo
Division of Otolaryngology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Laryngoscope. 2002 Jun;112(6):1019-24. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200206000-00016.
To determine the reliability of the assessment of laryngoscopic findings potentially associated with laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD).
Prospective randomized blinded study.
One hundred twenty video segments of rigid fiberoptic laryngeal examinations were prospectively analyzed by five otolaryngologists blinded to patient information and were scored according to several variables potentially associated with LPRD. Separate assessments of the degree of erythema and degree of edema were scored on a five-point scale for the anterior commissure, membranous vocal fold, and interarytenoid region. Similarly, interarytenoid pachydermia, likelihood of LPRD involvement, and severity of LPRD findings were assessed. For each of these scored physical findings, inter-rater and intrarater reliabilities were determined.
The inter-rater reliabilities of the laryngoscopic findings associated with LPRD were poor. Intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.161 and 0.461 for edema of the arytenoids and membranous vocal folds, respectively (P <.001). Intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.181 and 0.369 for erythema of the arytenoids and membranous vocal folds, respectively (P <.001). Raters demonstrated poor agreement as to the severity of LPRD findings (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.265) and the likelihood of an LPRD component for dysphonia (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.248). Similarly, intrarater reliability was extremely variable for the various physical findings, with Kendall correlation coefficients ranging from -0.121 to 0.837.
Accurate clinical assessment of laryngeal involvement with LPRD is likely to be difficult because laryngeal physical findings cannot be reliably determined from clinician to clinician. Such variability makes the precise laryngoscopic diagnosis of LPRD highly subjective.
确定对可能与喉咽反流病(LPRD)相关的喉镜检查结果评估的可靠性。
前瞻性随机双盲研究。
由五名对患者信息不知情的耳鼻喉科医生对120段硬质纤维喉镜检查的视频片段进行前瞻性分析,并根据几个可能与LPRD相关的变量进行评分。对前联合、膜性声带和杓间区的红斑程度和水肿程度分别进行五点量表评分。同样,评估杓间区肥厚、LPRD累及的可能性以及LPRD表现的严重程度。对于这些评分的体格检查结果,分别确定评分者间信度和评分者内信度。
与LPRD相关的喉镜检查结果的评分者间信度较差。杓状软骨和膜性声带水肿的组内相关系数分别为0.161和0.461(P <.001)。杓状软骨和膜性声带红斑的组内相关系数分别为0.181和0.369(P <.001)。评分者对LPRD表现的严重程度(组内相关系数,0.265)和发声障碍中LPRD成分的可能性(组内相关系数,0.248)的一致性较差。同样,评分者内信度在各种体格检查结果中变化极大,肯德尔相关系数范围为-0.121至0.837。
对LPRD所致喉部受累进行准确的临床评估可能很困难,因为临床医生之间无法可靠地确定喉部体格检查结果。这种变异性使得LPRD的精确喉镜诊断具有高度主观性。