Larsen Christen P, Regal Jean F
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology Graduate Program, University of Minnesota, 1035 University Drive, Duluth 55812-3031, USA.
Toxicology. 2002 Sep 2;178(2):89-99. doi: 10.1016/s0300-483x(02)00190-7.
Trimellitic anhydride (TMA) causes asthma after a latency period of sensitization. In non-sensitized humans and animals, limited studies indicate that TMA exposure may also cause symptoms of asthma without a latency period. Our previous studies (J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 296 (2001) 284) in a guinea pig model of TMA-induced asthma demonstrated that sensitization and the complement system were required for eosinophilia. TMA conjugated to guinea pig serum albumin (TMA-GPSA) was used to elicit the response. Since occupational exposure to TMA occurs by inhalation of dust, the present studies determined if exposure to TMA dust in a non-sensitized guinea pig elicited airway obstruction and inflammation, and whether a significantly greater response occurred after a latency period of sensitization. Guinea pigs were intradermally injected with either corn oil (non-sensitized animals) or 30% TMA (sensitized animals). Three weeks later they were challenged by intratracheal insufflation with 1 mg TMA dust or lactose dust (control) using a dry powder delivery device. Pulmonary resistance, dynamic lung compliance, mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate were monitored for 10 min. In non-sensitized guinea pigs, significant increases in pulmonary resistance and decreases in dynamic lung compliance and blood pressure occurred after TMA challenge. In sensitized animals, the same dose of TMA caused significantly greater effects compared to non-sensitized animals. In a separate experiment, cellular infiltration into the lung was determined 24 h after challenge with TMA dust or lactose dust. In both non-sensitized and sensitized animals, eosinophils in the lung tissue were increased after TMA dust challenge compared to controls. Thus, these studies suggest that the response in non-sensitized animals differs depending on whether TMA dust or TMA-GPSA is used to elicit the response. TMA dust elicits significant airway obstruction and eosinophilia in a non-sensitized animal, with even greater airway obstruction occurring in a sensitized animal.
偏苯三酸酐(TMA)在致敏潜伏期后会引发哮喘。在未致敏的人类和动物中,有限的研究表明,接触TMA也可能在没有潜伏期的情况下引发哮喘症状。我们之前在TMA诱导的哮喘豚鼠模型中的研究(《药理学与实验治疗学杂志》296 (2001) 284)表明,嗜酸性粒细胞增多需要致敏和补体系统。与豚鼠血清白蛋白结合的TMA(TMA-GPSA)被用于引发反应。由于职业性接触TMA是通过吸入粉尘发生的,本研究确定了在未致敏的豚鼠中接触TMA粉尘是否会引发气道阻塞和炎症,以及在致敏潜伏期后是否会出现明显更大的反应。豚鼠皮内注射玉米油(未致敏动物)或30% TMA(致敏动物)。三周后,使用干粉输送装置通过气管内吹入1毫克TMA粉尘或乳糖粉尘(对照)对它们进行激发。监测肺阻力、动态肺顺应性、平均动脉血压和心率10分钟。在未致敏的豚鼠中,TMA激发后肺阻力显著增加,动态肺顺应性和血压降低。在致敏动物中,相同剂量的TMA与未致敏动物相比产生了明显更大的影响。在另一个实验中,在TMA粉尘或乳糖粉尘激发后24小时测定肺内细胞浸润情况。与对照组相比,在未致敏和致敏动物中,TMA粉尘激发后肺组织中的嗜酸性粒细胞均增加。因此,这些研究表明,未致敏动物的反应因使用TMA粉尘还是TMA-GPSA引发反应而有所不同。TMA粉尘在未致敏动物中引发明显的气道阻塞和嗜酸性粒细胞增多,在致敏动物中气道阻塞甚至更严重。