Buus Søren, Florentine Mary
Institute for Hearing, Speech, and Language, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2002 Jun;3(2):120-39. doi: 10.1007/s101620010084.
This article examines how loudness grows with increasing intensity near threshold in five listeners with hearing losses of predominantly cochlear origin. It provides evidence against the pervasive and long-held notion that such listeners show abnormally rapid loudness growth near their elevated thresholds. As in a previous study for listeners with normal hearing, loudness functions near threshold were derived from loudness matches between a pure tone and four- or ten-tone complexes using a simple model of loudness summation. This study assumed that the loudness function had the same form for any component of a complex, but a scale factor that depended on the amount of hearing loss allowed the loudness at threshold to vary with frequency. The best-fitting loudness functions had low-level local exponents [i.e., slopes of the low-level loudness function plotted as log(loudness) versus log(intensity)] that were within the normal range. At 0 dB SL, the average local exponents were 1.26 for the listeners with hearing losses compared with 1.31 for normal listeners, which indicates that loudness near threshold grows at similar rates in normal listeners and listeners with hearing losses. The model also indicated that, on average, the loudness at threshold doubled for every 16 dB of hearing loss. The increased loudness at threshold, together with somewhat enlarged local exponents around 20 dB SL, accounts for the near-normal loudness often obtained for high-SPL tones in listeners with hearing losses. Such loudness functions are consistent with the steep functions shown by classical data on loudness matches between tones for which thresholds are normal and tones for which thresholds are elevated. Thus, the present data indicate that an abnormally large loudness at an elevated threshold is likely to be a better definition of recruitment than the classical definition of it as an abnormally rapid growth of loudness above an elevated threshold.
本文研究了五名主要因耳蜗病变而听力损失的听众,其响度在阈值附近随强度增加的增长情况。它提供了证据,反驳了一种普遍且长期存在的观点,即这类听众在其升高的阈值附近表现出异常快速的响度增长。与之前一项针对听力正常听众的研究一样,阈值附近的响度函数是通过使用一个简单的响度总和模型,从纯音与四音或十音复合音之间的响度匹配中推导出来的。本研究假设对于复合音的任何成分,响度函数具有相同的形式,但一个取决于听力损失程度的比例因子允许阈值处的响度随频率变化。最佳拟合的响度函数具有处于正常范围内的低水平局部指数[即绘制为对数(响度)与对数(强度)的低水平响度函数的斜率]。在0 dB SL时,听力损失听众的平均局部指数为1.26,而正常听众为1.31,这表明阈值附近的响度在正常听众和听力损失听众中以相似的速率增长。该模型还表明,平均而言,每16 dB的听力损失会使阈值处的响度翻倍。阈值处响度的增加,以及在20 dB SL附近略有增大的局部指数,解释了听力损失听众在高声压级音调时经常获得接近正常响度的原因。这样的响度函数与关于正常阈值音调与升高阈值音调之间响度匹配的经典数据所显示的陡峭函数一致。因此,目前的数据表明,与将重振经典定义为高于升高阈值的响度异常快速增长相比,升高阈值时异常大的响度可能是重振的更好定义。