Meek M E, Beauchamp R, Long G, Moir D, Turner L, Walker M
Existing Substances Division, Environmental Health Directorate, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2002 Jul-Sep;5(3):283-334. doi: 10.1080/10937400290070080.
Chloroform has been assessed as a Priority Substance under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act. The general population in Canada is exposed to chloroform principally through inhalation of indoor air, particularly during showering, and through ingestion of tap water. Data on concentrations of chloroform in various media were sufficient to serve as the basis for development of deterministic and probabilistic estimates of exposure for the general population in Canada. On the basis of data acquired principally in studies in experimental animals, chloroform causes hepatic and renal tumors in mice and renal tumors in rats. The weight of evidence indicates that chloroform is likely carcinogenic only at concentrations that induce the obligatory precursor lesions of cytotoxicity and proliferative regenerative response. Since this cytotoxicity is primarily related to rates of formation of reactive, oxidative metabolites, dose response has been characterized in the context of rates of formation of reactive metabolites in the target tissue. Results presented here are from a "hybrid" physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) animal model that was revised to permit its extension to humans. The relevant measure of exposure response, namely, the mean rate of metabolism in humans associated with a 5% increase in tumor risk (TC05), was estimated on the basis of this PBPK model and compared with tissue dose measures resulting from 24-h multimedia exposure scenarios for Canadians based on midpoint and 95th percentiles for concentrations in outdoor air, indoor air, air in the shower compartment, air in the bathroom after showering, tap water, and food. Nonneoplastic effects observed most consistently at lowest concentrations or doses following repeated exposures of rats and mice to chloroform are cytotoxicity and regenerative proliferation. As for cancer, target organs are the liver and kidney. In addition, chloroform has induced nasal lesions in rats and mice exposed by both inhalation and ingestion at lowest concentrations or doses. The mean rate of metabolism associated with a 5% increase in fatty cysts estimated on the basis of the PBPK model was compared with tissue dose measures resulting from the scenarios already described, and lowest concentrations reported to induce cellular proliferation in the nasal cavities of rats and mice were compared directly with midpoint and 95th percentile estimates of concentrations of chloroform in indoor air in Canada. The degree of confidence in the underlying database and uncertainties in estimates of exposure and in characterization of hazard and dose response are delineated.
根据《加拿大环境保护法》,氯仿已被评估为优先物质。加拿大普通民众接触氯仿主要是通过吸入室内空气,尤其是在淋浴时,以及通过饮用自来水。各种介质中氯仿浓度的数据足以作为确定和概率性估计加拿大普通民众接触情况的基础。基于主要在实验动物研究中获得的数据,氯仿可导致小鼠肝脏和肾脏肿瘤以及大鼠肾脏肿瘤。证据权重表明,氯仿可能仅在诱导细胞毒性和增殖性再生反应的必需前体病变的浓度下才具有致癌性。由于这种细胞毒性主要与活性氧化代谢物的形成速率有关,因此剂量反应已在目标组织中活性代谢物形成速率的背景下进行了表征。此处呈现的结果来自一个“混合”的基于生理的药代动力学(PBPK)动物模型,该模型经过修订以允许扩展至人类。基于此PBPK模型估计了与肿瘤风险增加5%(TC05)相关的人类平均代谢率这一暴露反应的相关指标,并与基于加拿大室外空气、室内空气、淋浴间空气、淋浴后浴室空气、自来水和食物中浓度的中点值和第95百分位数的24小时多介质暴露情景所产生的组织剂量测量值进行了比较。在大鼠和小鼠反复接触氯仿后,在最低浓度或剂量下最一致观察到的非肿瘤效应是细胞毒性和再生性增殖。至于癌症,靶器官是肝脏和肾脏。此外,氯仿在以最低浓度或剂量通过吸入和摄入暴露的大鼠和小鼠中诱发了鼻腔病变。将基于PBPK模型估计的与脂肪囊肿增加5%相关的平均代谢率与上述情景所产生的组织剂量测量值进行了比较,并将据报道诱导大鼠和小鼠鼻腔细胞增殖的最低浓度与加拿大室内空气中氯仿浓度的中点值和第95百分位数估计值直接进行了比较。阐述了基础数据库的置信度以及暴露估计、危害表征和剂量反应中的不确定性。