Paustenbach Dennis J, Finley Brent L, Mowat Fionna S, Kerger Brent D
ChemRisk, Alameda, California, USA.
J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2003 Jul 25;66(14):1295-339. doi: 10.1080/15287390306388.
Hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] has been detected in groundwater across the United States due to industrial and military operations, including plating, painting, cooling-tower water, and chromate production. Because inhalation of Cr(VI) can cause lung cancer in some persons exposed to a sufficient airborne concentration, questions have been raised about the possible hazards associated with exposure to Cr(VI) in tap water via ingestion, inhalation, and dermal contact. Although ingested Cr(VI) is generally known to be converted to Cr(III) in the stomach following ingestion, prior to the mid-1980s a quantitative analysis of the reduction capacity of the human stomach had not been conducted. Thus, risk assessments of the human health hazard posed by contaminated drinking water contained some degree of uncertainty. This article presents the results of nine studies, including seven dose reconstruction or simulation studies involving human volunteers, that quantitatively characterize the absorbed dose of Cr(VI) following contact with tap water via all routes of exposure. The methodology used here illustrates an approach that permits one to understand, within a very narrow range, the possible intake of Cr(VI) and the associated health risks for situations where little is known about historical concentrations of Cr(VI). Using red blood cell uptake and sequestration of chromium as an in vivo metric of Cr(VI) absorption, the primary conclusions of these studies were that: (1) oral exposure to concentrations of Cr(VI) in water up to 10 mg/L (ppm) does not overwhelm the reductive capacity of the stomach and blood, (2) the inhaled dose of Cr(VI) associated with showering at concentrations up to 10 mg/L is so small as to pose a de minimis cancer hazard, and (3) dermal exposures to Cr(VI) in water at concentrations as high as 22 mg/L do not overwhelm the reductive capacity of the skin or blood. Because Cr(VI) in water appears yellow at approximately 1-2 mg/L, the studies represent conditions beyond the worst-case scenario for voluntary human exposure. Based on a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for chromium derived from published studies, coupled with the dose reconstruction studies presented in this article, the available information clearly indicates that (1) Cr(VI) ingested in tap water at concentrations below 2 mg/L is rapidly reduced to Cr(III), and (2) even trace amounts of Cr(VI) are not systemically circulated. This assessment indicates that exposure to Cr(VI) in tap water via all plausible routes of exposure, at concentrations well in excess of the current U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) maximum contaminant level of 100 microg/L (ppb), and perhaps those as high as several parts per million, should not pose an acute or chronic health hazard to humans. These conclusions are consistent with those recently reached by a panel of experts convened by the State of California.
由于工业和军事活动,包括电镀、喷漆、冷却塔用水和铬酸盐生产,在美国各地的地下水中都检测到了六价铬[Cr(VI)]。由于吸入Cr(VI)会使某些接触到足够空气浓度的人患肺癌,人们对通过摄入、吸入和皮肤接触自来水中的Cr(VI)可能产生的危害提出了疑问。虽然一般认为摄入的Cr(VI)在摄入后会在胃中转化为Cr(III),但在20世纪80年代中期之前,尚未对人体胃的还原能力进行定量分析。因此,对受污染饮用水对人体健康危害的风险评估存在一定程度的不确定性。本文介绍了九项研究的结果,其中包括七项涉及人类志愿者的剂量重建或模拟研究,这些研究定量地描述了通过所有接触途径与自来水接触后Cr(VI)的吸收剂量。这里使用的方法说明了一种途径,该途径允许人们在非常狭窄的范围内了解Cr(VI)的可能摄入量以及在对Cr(VI)的历史浓度了解甚少的情况下相关的健康风险。使用红细胞对铬的摄取和螯合作为Cr(VI)吸收的体内指标,这些研究的主要结论是:(1)口服接触水中浓度高达10 mg/L(ppm)的Cr(VI)不会超过胃和血液的还原能力;(2)在浓度高达10 mg/L的情况下淋浴所吸入Cr(VI)的剂量非常小以至于构成极小的癌症危害;(3)皮肤接触浓度高达22 mg/L水中的Cr(VI)不会超过皮肤或血液的还原能力。由于水中的Cr(VI)在大约1-2 mg/L时呈黄色,这些研究代表了自愿人体接触最坏情况之外的条件。基于已发表研究得出的铬生理药代动力学模型,结合本文介绍的剂量重建研究,现有信息清楚地表明:(1)摄入浓度低于2 mg/L自来水中的Cr(VI)会迅速还原为Cr(III);(2)即使是痕量的Cr(VI)也不会全身循环。该评估表明,通过所有合理接触途径接触自来水中的Cr(VI),其浓度远超过美国环境保护局(EPA)目前100 μg/L(ppb)的最大污染物水平,甚至可能高达百万分之几,对人类不应构成急性或慢性健康危害。这些结论与加利福尼亚州召集的一个专家小组最近得出的结论一致。