Santoro Antonio, Mancini Elena, Basile Carlo, Amoroso Luigi, Di Giulio Salvatore, Usberti Mario, Colasanti Giuliano, Verzetti Giuseppe, Rocco Alessandro, Imbasciati Enrico, Panzetta Giovanni, Bolzani Roberto, Grandi Fabio, Polacchini Maurizio
Divisione de Nefrologia e Dialisi Malpighi, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, Via P. Palagi 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Kidney Int. 2002 Sep;62(3):1034-45. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00511.x.
Recently we have devised and tested a biofeedback system for controlling blood volume (BV) changes during hemodialysis (HD) along an ideal trajectory (blood volume tracking, BVT), continuously modifying the weight loss rate and dialysate conductivity. This multicenter, prospective, randomized, crossover study aimed to clarify whether BVT (treatment B) can improve hypotension-prone patients' treatment tolerance, compared with conventional hemodialysis (treatment A).
Thirty-six hypotension-prone patients enrolled from 10 hemodialysis (HD) centers were randomly assigned to either of the study sequences ABAB or BABA, each lasting four months.
A 30% reduction in intradialytic hypotension (IDH) events was observed in treatment B as compared with A (23.5% vs. 33.5%, P = 0.004). The reduction was related to the number of IDH in treatment A (y = 0.54x + 5; r = 0.4; P < 0.001): the more IDH episodes in treatment A, the better the response in treatment B. The best responders to treatment B showed pre-dialysis systolic blood pressure values higher than the poor responders (P = 0.04). A 10% overall reduction in inter-dialysis symptoms was obtained also in treatment B compared to A (P < 0.001). Body weight gain, pre-dialysis blood pressure, intradialytic weight loss as well as Kt/V did not differ between the two treatments.
An overall improvement in the treatment tolerance was observed with BVT, particularly intradialytic cardiovascular stability. Patients with the highest incidence of IDH during conventional HD and free from chronic pre-dialysis hypotension seem to respond better. Inter-dialysis symptoms also seem to improve with control of BV.
最近我们设计并测试了一种生物反馈系统,用于在血液透析(HD)期间沿着理想轨迹控制血容量(BV)变化(血容量追踪,BVT),持续调整体重减轻率和透析液电导率。这项多中心、前瞻性、随机、交叉研究旨在阐明与传统血液透析(治疗A)相比,BVT(治疗B)是否能提高低血压倾向患者的治疗耐受性。
从10个血液透析(HD)中心招募的36名低血压倾向患者被随机分配到ABAB或BABA两种研究序列中的一种,每个序列持续四个月。
与治疗A相比,治疗B的透析中低血压(IDH)事件减少了30%(23.5%对33.5%,P = 0.004)。这种减少与治疗A中的IDH数量有关(y = 0.54x + 5;r = 0.4;P < 0.001):治疗A中的IDH发作越多,治疗B中的反应越好。治疗B的最佳反应者显示透析前收缩压值高于反应不佳者(P = 0.04)。与治疗A相比,治疗B的透析间期症状总体减少了10%(P < 0.001)。两种治疗之间的体重增加、透析前血压、透析中体重减轻以及Kt/V没有差异。
观察到BVT可使治疗耐受性总体改善,尤其是透析中心血管稳定性。在传统HD期间IDH发生率最高且无慢性透析前低血压的患者似乎反应更好。通过控制BV,透析间期症状似乎也有所改善。