• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血液透析扩展的下一步发展:从基于德尔菲问卷调查法到意大利透析单位的实际情况。

The Next Evolution of HemoDialysis eXpanded: From a Delphi Questionnaire-Based Approach to the Real Life of Italian Dialysis Units.

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.

Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, ASL CN1, Cuneo, Italy.

出版信息

Blood Purif. 2022;51(11):943-952. doi: 10.1159/000522038. Epub 2022 Mar 1.

DOI:10.1159/000522038
PMID:35231902
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9808684/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Impact assessment of new technologies in chronic hemodialysis (HD) is challenging due to HD patient frailty, the complexity of HD clinical trials and practice variability among countries. Among the most recent HD innovations, medium cut-off (MCO) dialyzers present an optimized membrane geometry that provides enhanced clearances for middle and large molecular weight uremic toxins (UT). These toxins are poorly cleared by available HD techniques and largely contribute to patient morbidity and mortality. The aim of this paper is to assess the available clinical evidence about MCO membranes and to identify the next steps needed to generate conclusive data on their use in HD.

METHODS

With this purpose, we first reviewed and compared the current HD technologies aimed to improve the clearance of middle and large UT; subsequently, we used a Delphi questionnaire to identify and discuss the consensus about MCO efficacy within a large sample of the Italian Nephrology community.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Our investigation gathered a significant degree of consensus on the beneficial role of MCO membrane and expanded HD. Finally, we used our results to propose future trial designs and clinical investigations aimed to improve evidence quality about the use of these membranes in the present clinical scenario of dialysis units.

摘要

简介

由于慢性血液透析(HD)患者身体虚弱、HD 临床试验复杂以及各国之间的实践差异,新技术对 HD 的影响评估具有挑战性。在最近的 HD 创新中,中分子截留(MCO)透析器具有优化的膜几何形状,可为中大分子尿毒症毒素(UT)提供更好的清除率。这些毒素不能被现有的 HD 技术有效清除,是导致患者发病率和死亡率高的主要原因。本文旨在评估 MCO 膜的现有临床证据,并确定下一步需要采取哪些措施来生成关于其在 HD 中应用的明确数据。

方法

为此,我们首先回顾和比较了目前旨在提高中大分子 UT 清除率的 HD 技术;随后,我们使用 Delphi 问卷在意大利肾脏病学社区的大量样本中确定并讨论了对 MCO 疗效的共识。

结果和结论

我们的研究在 MCO 膜和扩展 HD 的有益作用方面达成了很高的共识。最后,我们利用研究结果提出了未来的试验设计和临床研究,旨在提高这些膜在当前透析单位临床环境下使用的证据质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e161/9808684/8b4cfd8d213f/bpu-0051-0943-g03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e161/9808684/c41d5fe20c67/bpu-0051-0943-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e161/9808684/969097c45338/bpu-0051-0943-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e161/9808684/8b4cfd8d213f/bpu-0051-0943-g03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e161/9808684/c41d5fe20c67/bpu-0051-0943-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e161/9808684/969097c45338/bpu-0051-0943-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e161/9808684/8b4cfd8d213f/bpu-0051-0943-g03.jpg

相似文献

1
The Next Evolution of HemoDialysis eXpanded: From a Delphi Questionnaire-Based Approach to the Real Life of Italian Dialysis Units.血液透析扩展的下一步发展:从基于德尔菲问卷调查法到意大利透析单位的实际情况。
Blood Purif. 2022;51(11):943-952. doi: 10.1159/000522038. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
2
Performance of hemodialysis with novel medium cut-off dialyzers.新型中截留量透析器的血液透析性能
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017 Jan 1;32(1):165-172. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfw310.
3
Comparison of Circulating Levels of Uremic Toxins in Hemodialysis Patients Treated with Medium Cut-Off Membranes and High-Flux Membranes: Theranova in Sisli Hamidiye Etfal (THE SHE) Randomized Control Study.中通量和高通量血液透析患者血液中尿毒症毒素水平的比较:希思利哈米迪耶埃特法尔的 Theranova(THE SHE)随机对照研究。
Blood Purif. 2020;49(6):733-742. doi: 10.1159/000508061. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
4
Comparative Effectiveness between Expanded Hemodialysis (Hemodialysis Using a Medium Cut-Off Dialyzer) and Mixed-Dilution Online Hemodiafiltration Using a High-Flux Dialyzer in Removing Middle-Molecule Uremic Toxins.扩展血液透析(使用中分子截留器的血液透析)与使用高通量透析器的混合稀释在线血液透析滤过在清除中分子尿毒症毒素方面的比较效果。
Blood Purif. 2022;51(11):923-931. doi: 10.1159/000521886. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
5
Effects of Hemodialysis Therapy Using Dialyzers with Medium Cut-Off Membranes on Middle Molecules.使用中截留量膜透析器的血液透析疗法对中分子物质的影响。
Contrib Nephrol. 2017;191:158-167. doi: 10.1159/000479264. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
6
Comparison of the removal of uraemic toxins with medium cut-off and high-flux dialysers: a randomized clinical trial.中分子截留和高通量透析器对尿毒症毒素清除效果的比较:一项随机临床试验。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2020 Feb 1;35(2):328-335. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfz189.
7
[Uremic Toxins: how can we improve the removal today?].[尿毒症毒素:如今我们如何改善清除效果?]
G Ital Nefrol. 2017 Sep 28;34(5):89-101.
8
Are medium cut-off membranes the future, or the promising reality for chronic hemodialysis patients?中通量透析器是慢性血液透析患者的未来还是充满希望的现实?
Rev Invest Clin. 2023 Dec 18;75(6):289-299. doi: 10.24875/RIC.23000213.
9
Medium Cut-Off Dialyzer versus Eight Hemodiafiltration Dialyzers: Comparison Using a Global Removal Score.中分子 cutoff 透析器与 8 种血液透析滤过透析器:使用全球清除评分的比较。
Blood Purif. 2019;48(2):167-174. doi: 10.1159/000499759. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
10
Comparison of High-Flux, Super High-Flux, Medium Cut-Off Hemodialysis and Online Hemodiafiltration on the Removal of Uremic Toxins.高通量、超高通量、中分子截留血液透析与在线血液透析滤过清除尿毒症毒素的比较。
Blood Purif. 2023;52(3):309-318. doi: 10.1159/000526891. Epub 2022 Oct 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Hemodiafiltration: Technical and Medical Insights.血液透析滤过:技术与医学见解
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Jan 21;10(2):145. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10020145.
2
Free Light Chains, High Mobility Group Box 1, and Mortality in Hemodialysis Patients.游离轻链、高迁移率族蛋白B1与血液透析患者的死亡率
J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 23;11(23):6904. doi: 10.3390/jcm11236904.
3
The Acceptability of Traditional Culture under the Background of Deep Learning.深度学习背景下的传统文化可接受性。

本文引用的文献

1
Citrate high volume on-line hemodiafiltration modulates serum Interleukin-6 and Klotho levels: the multicenter randomized controlled study "Hephaestus".枸橼酸盐高容量在线血液透析滤过调节血清白细胞介素-6 和 Klotho 水平:多中心随机对照研究“赫菲斯托斯”。
J Nephrol. 2021 Oct;34(5):1701-1710. doi: 10.1007/s40620-020-00943-6. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
2
Current and novel imaging techniques to evaluate myocardial dysfunction during hemodialysis.评估血液透析期间心肌功能障碍的现有和新型影像学技术。
Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2020 Nov;29(6):555-563. doi: 10.1097/MNH.0000000000000645.
3
The ERA-EDTA Registry Annual Report 2017: a summary.
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Aug 23;2022:4010099. doi: 10.1155/2022/4010099. eCollection 2022.
4
Clinical Management of Hemodialyzed Patients: From Pharmacological Interventions to Advanced Technologies.血液透析患者的临床管理:从药物干预到先进技术
J Clin Med. 2022 Jul 25;11(15):4310. doi: 10.3390/jcm11154310.
5
Immune System Dysfunction and Inflammation in Hemodialysis Patients: Two Sides of the Same Coin.血液透析患者的免疫系统功能障碍与炎症:同一硬币的两面
J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 28;11(13):3759. doi: 10.3390/jcm11133759.
《2017年欧洲肾脏最佳实践(ERA)-欧洲透析与移植协会(EDTA)注册报告:总结》
Clin Kidney J. 2020 Jun 22;13(4):693-709. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfaa048. eCollection 2020 Aug.
4
Efficacy and Safety of Expanded Hemodialysis with the Theranova 400 Dialyzer: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Theranova 400 透析器扩展血液透析的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020 Sep 7;15(9):1310-1319. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01210120. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
5
Benefits and harms of high-dose haemodiafiltration versus high-flux haemodialysis: the comparison of high-dose haemodiafiltration with high-flux haemodialysis (CONVINCE) trial protocol.高剂量血液透析滤过与高通量血液透析的利弊:高剂量血液透析滤过与高通量血液透析的比较(CONVINCE)试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 5;10(2):e033228. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033228.
6
Long-term effects of citric acid-based bicarbonate haemodialysis on patient outcomes: a survival propensity score-matched study in western France.长期柠檬酸基碳酸氢盐血液透析对患者结局的影响:法国西部的一项生存倾向评分匹配研究。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2020 Jul 1;35(7):1228-1236. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfz274.
7
Kidney disease trials for the 21st century: innovations in design and conduct.21 世纪的肾脏疾病试验:设计和实施的创新。
Nat Rev Nephrol. 2020 Mar;16(3):173-185. doi: 10.1038/s41581-019-0212-x. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
8
Comparison of the removal of uraemic toxins with medium cut-off and high-flux dialysers: a randomized clinical trial.中分子截留和高通量透析器对尿毒症毒素清除效果的比较:一项随机临床试验。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2020 Feb 1;35(2):328-335. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfz189.
9
Citrate anion improves chronic dialysis efficacy, reduces systemic inflammation and prevents Chemerin-mediated microvascular injury.柠檬酸盐阴离子可改善慢性透析疗效,减轻全身炎症反应,防止 Chemerin 介导的微血管损伤。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 23;9(1):10622. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47040-8.
10
Online hemodiafiltration and mortality risk in end-stage renal disease patients: A critical appraisal of current evidence.终末期肾病患者的在线血液透析滤过与死亡风险:对当前证据的批判性评估
Kidney Res Clin Pract. 2019 Jun 30;38(2):159-168. doi: 10.23876/j.krcp.18.0160.