Macklin R
Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2001 Mar;11(1):17-36. doi: 10.1353/ken.2001.0005.
Following a long process of revision, a new version of the Declaration of Helsinki was approved by the World Medical Association in 2000. Two provisions of the Declaration address ongoing international controversies regarding research sponsored by industrialized countries and conducted in developing countries. Despite the issuance of the final version of the Declaration, opponents remain locked in debate. Moreover, the Declaration remained silent on other prominent controversies concerning international research. An analysis of these current controversies reveals reasons why they are not likely to be readily resolved, despite apparent agreement by opponents on overarching ethical principles.
经过漫长的修订过程,《赫尔辛基宣言》的新版本于2000年获得世界医学协会批准。该宣言的两项条款涉及工业化国家资助并在发展中国家开展的研究在国际上持续存在的争议。尽管宣言的最终版本已经发布,但反对者仍陷入争论之中。此外,宣言对于国际研究的其他突出争议仍未置一词。对这些当前争议的分析揭示了尽管反对者在总体伦理原则上表面达成了一致,但这些争议为何不太可能轻易得到解决的原因。