Suppr超能文献

试验后医疗干预措施的获取:复杂性、挑战与解决方案。

Posttrial Access to Medical Interventions: Intricacies, Challenges, and Solutions.

作者信息

Singh Harmanjit, Rao Sunil Vishwas, Kakkar Ashish Kumar, Singh Jagjit, Manohar Hasitha Daina

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.

Department of Pharmacology, Karpaga Vinayaga Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Center, Kanchipuram, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2019 Jan-Mar;9(1):3-8. doi: 10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_218_18.

Abstract

With the recent increase in clinical trials, lower- and middle-income countries are preferred trial sites due to lower budgets and easy availability of potential participants. On trial completion, benefits to participants cease and it may affect their health adversely. Therefore, entitlement to posttrial access (PTA) of interventions is imperative. The Declaration of Helsinki and several other guidelines mandate that trial participants have access to experimentally proven efficacious drugs and that the research protocol should mention PTA provision mechanisms. A controversial question about PTA is whether, experimentally proven therapy should be made accessible to the control group as well as the community from which the participants were enrolled, especially if no satisfactory standard treatment exists. PTA has significant implications for various stakeholders - trial participants, investigators, sponsors, regulatory authorities, and governments and has been discussed and well addressed in recent guidelines issued by the Indian Council of Medical research. This article focuses on the PTA, guidelines related to PTA, disputes, different stakeholder perspectives, and practical difficulties in its implementation. It also looks at PTA from the Indian perspective and considers possible solutions to deal with the controversies.

摘要

随着近期临床试验的增加,低收入和中等收入国家因其预算较低且潜在参与者易于招募而成为首选的试验地点。试验结束后,参与者获得的益处终止,这可能会对他们的健康产生不利影响。因此,干预措施的试验后获取权(PTA)势在必行。《赫尔辛基宣言》和其他一些准则规定,试验参与者有权获得经实验证明有效的药物,并且研究方案应提及PTA的提供机制。一个关于PTA的有争议的问题是,对于对照组以及招募参与者的社区,是否也应提供经实验证明有效的治疗方法,尤其是在不存在令人满意的标准治疗方法的情况下。PTA对各类利益相关者——试验参与者、研究者、赞助商、监管机构以及政府——都具有重大影响,印度医学研究理事会最近发布的指南中已对其进行了讨论并妥善处理。本文重点关注PTA、与PTA相关的准则、争议、不同利益相关者的观点以及实施过程中的实际困难。文章还从印度的角度审视了PTA,并考虑了应对争议的可能解决方案。

相似文献

1
Posttrial Access to Medical Interventions: Intricacies, Challenges, and Solutions.
Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2019 Jan-Mar;9(1):3-8. doi: 10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_218_18.
3
Post-trial Access in Maternal Vaccine Trials.
Am J Perinatol. 2019 Jul;36(S 02):S41-S47. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1691799. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
5
Post-trial obligations in the Declaration of Helsinki 2013: classification, reconstruction and interpretation.
Dev World Bioeth. 2016 Aug;16(2):80-90. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12099. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
6
Conflicts of interest in research involving human beings.
J Int Bioethique. 2008 Mar-Jun;19(1-2):143-54, 202-3. doi: 10.3917/jib.191.0143.
7
Implementing post-trial access plans for HIV prevention research.
J Med Ethics. 2018 May;44(5):354-358. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104637. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
When the Trial Ends: The Case for Post-Trial Provisions in Clinical Psychedelic Research.
Neuroethics. 2024;17(1):3. doi: 10.1007/s12152-023-09536-z. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
10
The Council for International Organizations and Medical Sciences (CIOMS) guidelines on ethics of clinical trials.
Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2007 May;4(2):176-8, discussion 178-9. doi: 10.1513/pats.200701-011GC.

引用本文的文献

2
Perspectives of stakeholders on post-trial access arrangements in Ethiopia: a qualitative study.
Glob Bioeth. 2025 May 5;36(1):2497599. doi: 10.1080/11287462.2025.2497599. eCollection 2025.
3
MICROS: Asthma Control App for School Adolescents in a Low Resource Setting - A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023 Nov 30;17:3125-3133. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S438549. eCollection 2023.
4
An Ethical Imperative to Ensure Uninterrupted HIV Care Following Therapeutic Trials: One Experience in Peru.
AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2022 Jun;36(6):205-207. doi: 10.1089/apc.2022.0075.
5
Making a COVID-19 vaccine that works for everyone: ensuring equity and inclusivity in clinical trials.
Glob Health Action. 2021 Jan 1;14(1):1892309. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2021.1892309.

本文引用的文献

1
Post-trial obligations in the Declaration of Helsinki 2013: classification, reconstruction and interpretation.
Dev World Bioeth. 2016 Aug;16(2):80-90. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12099. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
3
Post-trial access to treatment for patients participating in clinical trials.
Perspect Clin Res. 2015 Apr-Jun;6(2):82-5. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.154003.
5
Post-trial access.
Perspect Clin Res. 2013 Jan;4(1):58-60. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.106391.
6
Provision of investigational drug after clinical research: review of literature, national and international guidelines.
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2011 Nov-Dec;57(6):710-6. doi: 10.1590/s0104-42302011000600021.
7
Reasons Why Post-Trial Access to Trial Drugs Should, or Need not be Ensured to Research Participants: A Systematic Review.
Public Health Ethics. 2011 Jul;4(2):160-184. doi: 10.1093/phe/phr013. Epub 2011 Jul 11.
8
Going from principles to rules in research ethics.
Bioethics. 2011 Jan;25(1):9-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01744.x.
9
Post-trial access to antiretrovirals: who owes what to whom?
Bioethics. 2011 Mar;25(3):145-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01736.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验