Singh Harmanjit, Rao Sunil Vishwas, Kakkar Ashish Kumar, Singh Jagjit, Manohar Hasitha Daina
Department of Pharmacology, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.
Department of Pharmacology, Karpaga Vinayaga Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Center, Kanchipuram, Tamil Nadu, India.
Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2019 Jan-Mar;9(1):3-8. doi: 10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_218_18.
With the recent increase in clinical trials, lower- and middle-income countries are preferred trial sites due to lower budgets and easy availability of potential participants. On trial completion, benefits to participants cease and it may affect their health adversely. Therefore, entitlement to posttrial access (PTA) of interventions is imperative. The Declaration of Helsinki and several other guidelines mandate that trial participants have access to experimentally proven efficacious drugs and that the research protocol should mention PTA provision mechanisms. A controversial question about PTA is whether, experimentally proven therapy should be made accessible to the control group as well as the community from which the participants were enrolled, especially if no satisfactory standard treatment exists. PTA has significant implications for various stakeholders - trial participants, investigators, sponsors, regulatory authorities, and governments and has been discussed and well addressed in recent guidelines issued by the Indian Council of Medical research. This article focuses on the PTA, guidelines related to PTA, disputes, different stakeholder perspectives, and practical difficulties in its implementation. It also looks at PTA from the Indian perspective and considers possible solutions to deal with the controversies.
随着近期临床试验的增加,低收入和中等收入国家因其预算较低且潜在参与者易于招募而成为首选的试验地点。试验结束后,参与者获得的益处终止,这可能会对他们的健康产生不利影响。因此,干预措施的试验后获取权(PTA)势在必行。《赫尔辛基宣言》和其他一些准则规定,试验参与者有权获得经实验证明有效的药物,并且研究方案应提及PTA的提供机制。一个关于PTA的有争议的问题是,对于对照组以及招募参与者的社区,是否也应提供经实验证明有效的治疗方法,尤其是在不存在令人满意的标准治疗方法的情况下。PTA对各类利益相关者——试验参与者、研究者、赞助商、监管机构以及政府——都具有重大影响,印度医学研究理事会最近发布的指南中已对其进行了讨论并妥善处理。本文重点关注PTA、与PTA相关的准则、争议、不同利益相关者的观点以及实施过程中的实际困难。文章还从印度的角度审视了PTA,并考虑了应对争议的可能解决方案。