Suppr超能文献

刮宫术与电干燥法的现状

The current status of curettage and electrodesiccation.

作者信息

Goldman Glenn

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Fletcher Allen Health Center, 1 South Prospect Street, Burlington, VT 05495, USA.

出版信息

Dermatol Clin. 2002 Jul;20(3):569-78, ix. doi: 10.1016/s0733-8635(02)00022-0.

Abstract

Curettage and electrodesiccation (CE) is a technique widely used in the destruction of benign and selected malignant cutaneous neoplasms. CE is used mainly by dermatologists and family practice physicians, whereas plastic surgeons and other surgeons excise most benign and malignant lesions. The use of CE for the treatment of skin cancer has been widely extolled and also fervently criticized. Some practitioners treat most non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSC) with CE, and others have called for abandoning the technique in the treatment of such lesions. A thorough review of the literature reveals that CE has both virtues and flaws. In taking a rational approach to the treatment of benign and malignant cutaneous lesions it is essential to learn the basis for CE, the likely cure rates for given lesions, the proper technique, and the expected level of cosmesis. As the surgical treatment of skin cancer has become firmly entrenched in the field of dermatology, it is valuable to examine this technique in depth and to come to some thoughtful conclusions about its use for patients with skin cancer and assorted benign skin lesions. Last year a remarkably complete and exhaustive favorable review of curettage, electrosurgery, and skin cancer was published by Sheridan and Dawber. This article is a must read for anyone performing curettage; however, the author is writing with a slightly different perspective, that of a dermatologic surgeon. Although the author believes that CE has value and he uses this technique frequently, he disagrees with some of the truisms expressed in the literature about CE and attempts to define carefully what he believes are the strengths and limitations of this technique.

摘要

刮除术与电干燥法(CE)是一种广泛应用于良性及特定恶性皮肤肿瘤切除的技术。CE主要由皮肤科医生和家庭医生使用,而整形外科医生和其他外科医生则切除大多数良性和恶性病变。CE用于治疗皮肤癌,既受到广泛赞誉,也遭到强烈批评。一些从业者用CE治疗大多数非黑色素瘤皮肤癌(NMSC),而另一些人则呼吁放弃该技术用于此类病变的治疗。对文献的全面回顾表明,CE既有优点也有缺点。在合理治疗良性和恶性皮肤病变时,了解CE的基础、特定病变的可能治愈率、正确的技术以及预期的美容效果至关重要。随着皮肤癌的外科治疗在皮肤科领域已牢固确立,深入研究该技术并就其用于皮肤癌患者和各种良性皮肤病变得出一些深思熟虑的结论是很有价值的。去年,谢里丹和道伯发表了一篇关于刮除术、电外科手术和皮肤癌的非常完整且详尽的正面综述。这篇文章是任何进行刮除术的人必读的;然而,作者是从皮肤科外科医生的略有不同的角度来写的。尽管作者认为CE有价值且他经常使用该技术,但他不同意文献中关于CE所表达的一些公认观点,并试图仔细界定他认为该技术的优势和局限性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验