Rodriguez-Vigil Tomas, Vázquez-López Francisco, Perez-Oliva Narciso
Department of Dermatology, Asturias Central University Hospital, University of Oviedo, Spain.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007 Jan;56(1):91-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2006.07.007.
The incidence of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is increasing. Curettage and electrodesiccation (CE) are not recommended for BCC treatment at medium- and high-risk facial sites. Surgical excision has been proposed as the treatment of choice.
We sought to evaluate the cumulative recurrence rate (RR) of primary BCC in facial areas of medium and high risk after CE.
This nonrandomized, clinical trial enrolled 257 patients with primary BCC located in medium- and high-risk facial areas, and treated with 4 or 5 cycles of CE by a single operator from a section specializing in BCC CE in a tertiary teaching hospital in Oviedo, Spain. Exclusion criteria for study entry included: recurrent BCC, fibrosing BCC, ill-defined BCC, and BCC larger than 10 mm in diameter (high-risk facial sites) or larger than 15 mm in diameter (medium-risk sites); BCC smaller than 4 mm; and nonbiopsy-proven BCC. BCCs included in the study were from the nose, and paranasal and nasal-labial fold (n = 105); eyelids and canthi (n = 48); perioral areas (n = 12); ears (n = 11); forehead and temples (n = 48); periauricular areas (n = 14); and malar areas and cheeks (n = 19). The primary outcome was recurrence of carcinoma, which was clinically evaluated by at least two observers in consensus. Data were analyzed using both a life table method and Kaplan-Meier analysis. The statistical analysis included best- and worst-case scenarios (which means that all cases lost to follow-up were considered as recurrences).
The 5-year cumulative non-RR in the best-case scenario was 98.80% (SE 0.70, 95% confidence interval 97.40%-100%); thus, a 5-year cumulative RR of 1.20% was found after CE in our medium- and high-risk BCCs of the face (best case). The 5-year cumulative non-RR in the worst-case scenario was 79.40% (95% confidence interval 78.90%-79.90%); thus, a 5-year cumulative RR of 20.60%.
Retrospective design with a relatively small number of patients lost to follow-up is a study limitation.
High 5-year cure rates can be obtained after CE of primary, nonfibrosing BCCs of medium- and high-risk areas of the face performed in a specialized section.
基底细胞癌(BCC)的发病率正在上升。刮除术和电干燥法(CE)不推荐用于中高风险面部区域的BCC治疗。手术切除已被提议作为首选治疗方法。
我们试图评估CE后中高风险面部区域原发性BCC的累积复发率(RR)。
这项非随机临床试验纳入了257例原发性BCC患者,这些患者位于中高风险面部区域,由西班牙奥维耶多一家三级教学医院专门从事BCC CE的科室的一名操作人员进行4或5个周期的CE治疗。研究纳入的排除标准包括:复发性BCC、纤维化BCC、边界不清的BCC,以及直径大于10 mm(高风险面部部位)或大于15 mm(中风险部位)的BCC;直径小于4 mm的BCC;以及未经活检证实的BCC。纳入研究的BCC来自鼻子、鼻旁和鼻唇沟(n = 105);眼睑和眼角(n = 48);口周区域(n = 12);耳朵(n = 11);额头和颞部(n = 48);耳周区域(n = 14);以及颧部和脸颊(n = 19)。主要结局是癌的复发,由至少两名观察者进行临床一致性评估。数据采用寿命表法和Kaplan-Meier分析进行分析。统计分析包括最佳和最坏情况(这意味着所有失访病例都被视为复发)。
在最佳情况下,5年累积无复发率为98.80%(标准误0.70,95%置信区间97.40%-100%);因此,在我们面部中高风险的BCC中,CE后5年累积RR为1.20%(最佳情况)。在最坏情况下,5年累积无复发率为79.40%(95%置信区间78.90%-79.90%);因此,5年累积RR为20.60%。
研究的局限性在于采用回顾性设计,且失访患者数量相对较少。
在专门科室对中高风险面部区域的原发性、非纤维化BCC进行CE后,可获得较高的5年治愈率。