Castonguay L G
Department of Psychology, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16803, USA.
Ethics Behav. 2002;12(1):31-42. doi: 10.1207/S15327019EB1201_2.
The major argument of this article is that failing to measure what is taking place in treatment and control conditions can lead to scientifically invalid conclusions. It is argued that researchers are ethically responsible for being aware that variables related to the therapist, client, and the therapeutic relationship (as well as their interaction) might play a confounding role when treatment and control conditions are compared. As a consequence, they should either measure those variables or be tentative in their interpretation of their findings.
本文的主要观点是,未能衡量治疗和对照条件下所发生的情况可能会导致科学上无效的结论。有人认为,研究人员在伦理上有责任意识到,在比较治疗和对照条件时,与治疗师、来访者以及治疗关系(及其相互作用)相关的变量可能会起到混淆作用。因此,他们要么对这些变量进行测量,要么在对研究结果的解释上持谨慎态度。