Hüttl T P, Wichmann M W, Geiger T K, Schildberg F W, Fürst H
Department of Surgery, Klinikum Grosshadern, University of Munich, 81366 Munich, Germany.
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2002 Jul;387(3-4):125-9. doi: 10.1007/s00423-002-0294-x. Epub 2002 Apr 30.
This study evaluated the techniques and short-term results of surgical treatment for esophageal cancer in Germany by a nationwide representative survey.
In 2000 a questionnaire including 63 structured items concerning indication, technique, number of procedures, complications, and hospital mortality was sent to 308 randomly selected general, gastrointestinal, and thoracic surgeons and all university hospitals in Germany (20% of all surgeons). The response rate was 76% ( n=234).
In 1999 the 56 participating hospitals performed approximately 370,000 procedures, including 1,677 operations for esophageal diseases, including 891 esophagectomies, 706 for esophageal cancer, 285 for cancer of the cardia. Gastric interposition was the most common technique to restore alimentary tract continuity (86%). Interposition of the colon (ascending colon 64%) is a common procedure only in 22 centers, indicating that experience with this means of esophageal reconstruction is limited. There were no significant differences in complication and mortality rates between gastric transposition and colon interposition. The overall complication rate was 61%, with 36% after gastric interposition and 42% after colon interposition. Anastomotic leakages occurred in 12% and 15%, respectively, and the rate of graft necrosis was 3% in both groups. Hospital mortality was 8% with gastric transposition and 11% with colon interposition. Mean postoperative hospital stay was 24 days.
This study indicates that gastric transposition is frequently used for reconstruction after esophageal resection for malignant disease. It appears that the colon is not as accepted as the stomach for reconstruction, although the reported complication rates compare well with those reported after gastric transposition. This study allows a realistic evaluation of the overall risk of these surgical techniques.
本研究通过一项全国性代表性调查评估了德国食管癌外科治疗的技术及短期疗效。
2000年,一份包含63个关于适应证、技术、手术数量、并发症及医院死亡率的结构化项目的问卷被发送给德国随机选取的308名普通外科、胃肠外科和胸外科医生以及所有大学医院(占所有外科医生的20%)。回复率为76%(n = 234)。
1999年,56家参与调查的医院共进行了约370,000例手术,其中包括1,677例食管疾病手术,包括891例食管切除术,706例食管癌手术,285例贲门癌手术。胃代食管术是恢复消化道连续性最常用的技术(86%)。结肠代食管术(升结肠代食管64%)仅在22个中心较为常用,这表明这种食管重建方式的经验有限。胃代食管术和结肠代食管术在并发症和死亡率方面无显著差异。总体并发症发生率为61%,胃代食管术后为36%,结肠代食管术后为42%。吻合口漏发生率分别为12%和15%,两组移植坏死率均为3%。胃代食管术的医院死亡率为8%,结肠代食管术为11%。术后平均住院时间为24天。
本研究表明,胃代食管术常用于恶性疾病食管切除术后的重建。尽管报道的结肠代食管术并发症发生率与胃代食管术相当,但结肠代食管术似乎不如胃代食管术那样被广泛接受。本研究有助于对这些手术技术的总体风险进行实际评估。