Stumvoll Michael, Häring Hans-Ulrich
Medizinische Klinik, Abteilung für Endokrinologie, Stoffwechsel und Pathobiochemie, Eberhard-Karls-Universität, Tübingen, Germany.
Ann Med. 2002;34(3):217-24.
With the thiazolidinediones rosiglitazone and pioglitazone a novel treatment modality for type 2 diabetes has become available in many countries. As monotherapy, fasting blood glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), on average, can be improved by approximately 40 mg/dl and almost 1%, respectively. In combination with other agents their efficacy is additive. Thiazolidinediones reduce insulin resistance not only in type 2 diabetes but also in non-diabetic conditions associated with insulin resistance such as obesity. The mechanism of action involves binding to the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)gamma, a transcription factor that regulates the expression of specific genes especially in fat cells but also in other tissues. It is likely that thiazolidinediones primarily act in adipose tissue where PPARgamma is predominantly expressed. Thiazolidinediones have been shown to interfere with expression and release of mediators of insulin resistance originating in adipose tissue (e.g. free fatty acids, adipocytokines such as tumor necrosis factor alpha, resistin, adiponectin) in a way that results in net improvement of insulin sensitivity (i.e. in muscle and liver). Nevertheless, a direct molecular effect in skeletal muscle cannot be excluded. Interference with transcription entails a potential for side-effect risk, that cannot definitively be assessed yet. For example, the in-vitro stimulation of adipogenic differentiation may underlie the clinical observation of weight gain. Theoretically, this may turn out to be counterproductive in the long run. However, there is not sufficient evidence from humans at the moment, especially no long-term data, to allow a conclusive statement. The hepatotoxicity observed with troglitazone, on the other hand, does not seem to be PPARgamma-mediated but secondary to toxic metabolites. Based on differences in drug metabolism this problem is relatively unlikely to occur with rosiglitazone or pioglitazone. Unexplained but not unimportant is the propensity for fluid retention. In summary, with the thiazolidinediones a novel concept for the treatment of insulin resistance is available that in theory could also be used for prevention of type 2 diabetes. Long-term data are indispensable for a final risk-benefit assessment of these substances.
在许多国家,噻唑烷二酮类药物罗格列酮和吡格列酮为2型糖尿病提供了一种新的治疗方式。作为单一疗法,空腹血糖和糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)平均分别可改善约40mg/dl和近1%。与其他药物联合使用时,其疗效具有相加性。噻唑烷二酮类药物不仅可降低2型糖尿病患者的胰岛素抵抗,还可降低与胰岛素抵抗相关的非糖尿病状态(如肥胖)下的胰岛素抵抗。其作用机制涉及与过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体(PPAR)γ结合,PPARγ是一种转录因子,可调节特定基因的表达,尤其是在脂肪细胞以及其他组织中的表达。噻唑烷二酮类药物可能主要在PPARγ主要表达的脂肪组织中发挥作用。噻唑烷二酮类药物已被证明可干扰源自脂肪组织的胰岛素抵抗介质(如游离脂肪酸、细胞因子如肿瘤坏死因子α、抵抗素、脂联素)的表达和释放,从而使胰岛素敏感性(即肌肉和肝脏中的胰岛素敏感性)得到净改善。然而,不能排除其对骨骼肌有直接分子效应。干扰转录存在潜在的副作用风险,目前尚无法明确评估。例如,体外刺激脂肪生成分化可能是体重增加这一临床观察结果的基础。从理论上讲,从长远来看这可能会适得其反。然而,目前尚无足够的人体证据,尤其是缺乏长期数据,无法得出确凿结论。另一方面,曲格列酮所观察到的肝毒性似乎并非由PPARγ介导,而是由有毒代谢产物所致。基于药物代谢的差异,罗格列酮或吡格列酮相对不太可能出现这个问题。无法解释但并非不重要的是其发生液体潴留的倾向。总之,噻唑烷二酮类药物为胰岛素抵抗的治疗提供了一个新的概念,理论上也可用于预防2型糖尿病。对于这些药物进行最终的风险效益评估,长期数据是必不可少的。