Behm David G, Anderson Kenneth, Curnew Robert S
School of Human Kinetics and Recreation, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Canada A1C 5S7.
J Strength Cond Res. 2002 Aug;16(3):416-22.
The objective of this study was to determine differences in isometric force output, muscle activation (interpolated twitch technique), and electromyographic activity of the quadriceps, plantar flexors (PF), and their antagonists under stable and unstable conditions. Instability in subjects was introduced by making them perform contractions while seated on a "Swiss ball." Eight male subjects performed unilateral leg extensor (LE) and PF contractions while seated on a bench (LE), chair (PF), or a ball. Unstable LE and PF forces were 70.5 and 20.2% less than their stable counterparts, respectively. Unstable quadriceps and PF activation averaged 44.3 and 2.9% less than activation under stable conditions. Unstable antagonist/agonist ratios were 40.2 and 30.7% greater than stable ratios in the LE and PF protocols, respectively. The greater decrements with LE can be attributed to the instability of only 2 points of floor contact, rather than 3 points of floor contact as with the PF. Swiss balls may permit a strength training adaptation of the limbs, if instability is moderate, allowing the production of overload forces.
本研究的目的是确定在稳定和不稳定条件下,等长力输出、肌肉激活(内插单收缩技术)以及股四头肌、跖屈肌(PF)及其拮抗肌的肌电图活动的差异。通过让受试者坐在“瑞士球”上进行收缩来引入不稳定性。八名男性受试者在长凳(腿部伸展,LE)、椅子(跖屈,PF)或球上就座时进行单侧腿部伸展(LE)和PF收缩。不稳定的LE和PF力量分别比其稳定状态下的力量小70.5%和20.2%。不稳定状态下股四头肌和PF的激活平均比稳定条件下的激活少44.3%和2.9%。在LE和PF方案中,不稳定状态下的拮抗肌/主动肌比率分别比稳定比率大40.2%和30.7%。LE力量下降幅度更大可归因于与PF相比,LE只有两点与地面接触,而PF有三点与地面接触,稳定性较差。如果不稳定性适中,瑞士球可能允许肢体进行力量训练适应性调整,从而产生超负荷力量。