Niklas Karl J
The Department of Plant Biology, 228 Plant Science Building or 462 Mann Library, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-5908, USA.
J Theor Biol. 2002 Jul 7;217(1):47-52. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.2002.3019.
Prior explicit allometric models are extended to predict the scaling relationship between the ability of plants with leafless stems to harvest sunlight H and total standing plant biomass M(T) (which equals the sum of standing stem and root biomass, M(S) and M(R)). Provided that H scales in a directly proportional manner (isometrically) with respect to either stem surface area (i.e.H proportional, variant SA(S) ) or total stem biomass (i.e. H proportional, variant M(S)), the allometric model presented here predicts that SA(S) proportional, variant M(T)(3/4) or M(S) proportional, variant M(T)(3/4), respectively. These alternative predictions are tested empirically using data for standing stem and root biomass gathered for the large columnar cactus species Pachycereus pringlei. Statistical comparisons between observed and predicted scaling relationships indicate that SA(S) proportional, variant M(T)(3/4), whereas M(S) proportional, variant M(T)(3/4) is mathematically inconsistent with the observation that stem biomass scales nearly isometrically with respect to root biomass. The contention that the H of leafless stems scales isometrically with respect to stem surface area is thus reasonable both theoretically and empirically.
先前的显式异速生长模型被扩展,以预测无叶茎植物捕获阳光的能力H与植物总现存生物量M(T)(等于茎和根的现存生物量之和,即M(S)和M(R))之间的比例关系。假设H与茎表面积(即H ∝ SA(S))或茎总生物量(即H ∝ M(S))呈正比关系(等比关系),这里提出的异速生长模型预测,SA(S) ∝ M(T)(3/4) 或 M(S) ∝ M(T)(3/4)。利用从大型柱状仙人掌物种平氏强刺球收集的茎和根现存生物量数据,对这些替代预测进行了实证检验。观察到的和预测的比例关系之间的统计比较表明,SA(S) ∝ M(T)(3/4),而M(S) ∝ M(T)(3/4)在数学上与茎生物量相对于根生物量几乎呈等比关系的观察结果不一致。因此,无叶茎的H与茎表面积呈等比关系这一论点在理论和实证上都是合理的。