Cheng Dongliang, Ma Yuzhu, Zhong Quanling, Xu Weifeng
College of Geographical Science, Fujian Normal University Fuzhou, Fujian Province, 350007, China ; State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong Shatin, Hongkong, 999077, China.
College of Geographical Science, Fujian Normal University Fuzhou, Fujian Province, 350007, China.
Ecol Evol. 2014 Oct;4(20):3968-77. doi: 10.1002/ece3.1184. Epub 2014 Sep 27.
Allometric biomass allocation theory predicts that leaf biomass (M L ) scaled isometrically with stem (M S ) and root (M R ) biomass, and thus above-ground biomass (leaf and stem) (M A ) and root (M R ) scaled nearly isometrically with below-ground biomass (root) for tree seedlings across a wide diversity of taxa. Furthermore, prior studies also imply that scaling constant should vary with species. However, litter is known about whether such invariant isometric scaling exponents hold for intraspecific biomass allocation, and how variation in scaling constants influences the interspecific scaling relationship between above- and below-ground biomass. Biomass data of seedlings from five evergreen species were examined to test scaling relationships among biomass components across and within species. Model Type II regression was used to compare the numerical values of scaling exponents and constants among leaf, stem, root, and above- to below-ground biomass. The results indicated that M L and M S scaled in an isometric or a nearly isometric manner with M R , as well as M A to M R for five woody species. Significant variation was observed in the Y-intercepts of the biomass scaling curves, resulting in the divergence for intraspecific scaling and interspecific scaling relationships for M L versus M S and M L versus M R , but not for M S versus M R and M A versus M R . We conclude, therefore, that a nearly isometric scaling relationship of M A versus M R holds true within each of the studied woody species and across them irrespective the negative scaling relationship between leaf and stem.
异速生物量分配理论预测,叶生物量((M_L))与茎生物量((M_S))和根生物量((M_R))呈等比例缩放,因此,对于广泛分类群中的树苗而言,地上生物量(叶和茎)((M_A))和根生物量((M_R))与地下生物量(根)几乎呈等比例缩放。此外,先前的研究还表明,缩放常数应随物种而变化。然而,关于这种不变的等比例缩放指数是否适用于种内生物量分配,以及缩放常数的变化如何影响地上和地下生物量之间的种间缩放关系,我们知之甚少。研究了五个常绿树种幼苗的生物量数据,以测试物种间和物种内生物量组分之间的缩放关系。使用II型回归模型比较叶、茎、根以及地上与地下生物量之间缩放指数和常数的数值。结果表明,对于五个木本物种,(M_L)和(M_S)与(M_R)呈等比例或近等比例缩放,(M_A)与(M_R)也是如此。在生物量缩放曲线的(Y)轴截距中观察到显著差异,导致(M_L)与(M_S)以及(M_L)与(M_R)的种内缩放和种间缩放关系出现分歧,但(M_S)与(M_R)以及(M_A)与(M_R)没有出现分歧。因此,我们得出结论,无论叶和茎之间存在负缩放关系,(M_A)与(M_R)的近等比例缩放关系在每个研究的木本物种内以及所有物种之间都成立。