Cheng Dongliang, Zhong Quanlin, Niklas Karl J, Ma Yuzhu, Yang Yusheng, Zhang Jianhua
Institute of Geography, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province 350007, China, State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong 999077, China, Section of Plant Biology, School of Integrative Plant Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA and Key Laboratory of Humid Subtropical Eco-geographical Process, Fujian Normal University, Ministry of Education, Fuzhou, Fujian Province 350007, China Institute of Geography, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province 350007, China, State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong 999077, China, Section of Plant Biology, School of Integrative Plant Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA and Key Laboratory of Humid Subtropical Eco-geographical Process, Fujian Normal University, Ministry of Education, Fuzhou, Fujian Province 350007, China.
Institute of Geography, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province 350007, China, State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong 999077, China, Section of Plant Biology, School of Integrative Plant Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA and Key Laboratory of Humid Subtropical Eco-geographical Process, Fujian Normal University, Ministry of Education, Fuzhou, Fujian Province 350007, China.
Ann Bot. 2015 Feb;115(2):303-13. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcu238. Epub 2015 Jan 5.
Empirical studies and allometric partitioning (AP) theory indicate that plant above-ground biomass (MA) scales, on average, one-to-one (isometrically) with below-ground biomass (MR) at the level of individual trees and at the level of entire forest communities. However, the ability of the AP theory to predict the biomass allocation patterns of understorey plants has not been established because most previous empirical tests have focused on canopy tree species or very large shrubs.
In order to test the AP theory further, 1586 understorey sub-tropical forest plants from 30 sites in south-east China were harvested and examined. The numerical values of the scaling exponents and normalization constants (i.e. slopes and y-intercepts, respectively) of log-log linear MA vs. MR relationships were determined for all individual plants, for each site, across the entire data set, and for data sorted into a total of 19 sub-sets of forest types and successional stages. Similar comparisons of MA/MR were also made.
The data revealed that the mean MA/MR of understorey plants was 2·44 and 1·57 across all 1586 plants and for all communities, respectively, and MA scaled nearly isometrically with respect to MR, with scaling exponents of 1·01 for all individual plants and 0·99 for all communities. The scaling exponents did not differ significantly among different forest types or successional stages, but the normalization constants did, and were positively correlated with MA/MR and negatively correlated with scaling exponents across all 1586 plants.
The results support the AP theory's prediction that MA scales nearly one-to-one with MR (i.e. MA ∝ MR (≈1·0)) and that plant biomass partitioning for individual plants and at the community level share a strikingly similar pattern, at least for the understorey plants examined in this study. Furthermore, variation in environmental conditions appears to affect the numerical values of normalization constants, but not the scaling exponents of the MA vs. MR relationship. This feature of the results suggests that plant size is the primary driver of the MA vs. MR biomass allocation pattern for understorey plants in sub-tropical forests.
实证研究和异速生长分配(AP)理论表明,在单株树木和整个森林群落层面,植物地上生物量(MA)平均与地下生物量(MR)呈一对一(等速)比例关系。然而,AP理论预测林下植物生物量分配模式的能力尚未得到证实,因为此前大多数实证检验都集中在冠层树种或非常大的灌木上。
为了进一步检验AP理论,对来自中国东南部30个地点的1586种亚热带森林林下植物进行了采集和检测。确定了所有单株植物、每个地点、整个数据集以及分为总共19个森林类型和演替阶段子集的数据中,对数-对数线性MA与MR关系的缩放指数和归一化常数(即分别为斜率和y轴截距)的数值。还对MA/MR进行了类似比较。
数据显示,在所有1586种植物和所有群落中,林下植物的平均MA/MR分别为2.44和1.57,MA相对于MR几乎呈等速缩放,所有单株植物的缩放指数为1.01,所有群落的缩放指数为0.99。不同森林类型或演替阶段之间的缩放指数没有显著差异,但归一化常数有显著差异,并且在所有1586种植物中,归一化常数与MA/MR呈正相关,与缩放指数呈负相关。
结果支持AP理论的预测,即MA与MR几乎呈一对一比例关系(即MA ∝ MR(≈1.0)),并且单株植物和群落层面的植物生物量分配具有显著相似的模式,至少对于本研究中检测的林下植物是如此。此外,环境条件的变化似乎会影响归一化常数的数值,但不会影响MA与MR关系的缩放指数。结果的这一特征表明,植物大小是亚热带森林林下植物MA与MR生物量分配模式的主要驱动因素。