Dudley-Rowley M
Sociology Department, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208, USA.
Hum Perf Extrem Environ. 1997 Jun;2(1):119-27.
The space venture resembles other extreme environmental exploration in many respects. Since the beginning of the space program, social and behavioral scientists have predicted that space crews increasingly will begin to experience the kinds of deviant behaviors seen in other extreme environmental duty settings as mission duration, crew size, and heterogeneity increases. However, there has been a long history of neglect by the nation's space agency of those psychosocial human factors which will play such a vital role in future manned spaceflight. The author argues that this is counterproductive, even dangerous, and that social and behavioral studies must be conducted to generate baseline data regarding dysfunctional acts in extreme environments, including the milieu of the space mission. An obstacle to studying occurrences and frequencies of deviant acts is the absence of a standardized definition of such acts in the extreme environment. Borrowing the sanitized NASA term "off-nominal", which generally refers to a maladaptive action, a preliminary reliability test was conducted among five scientists who work with human interaction in extreme environments. They were asked to rate situations from several actual space and polar expeditions for numbers of off-nominal acts. They were told the object of the exercise was to derive a standardized definition and were not provided with any specific definition of off-nominality. Substantial agreement in their ratings provided reliable information to construct a working definition of off-nominality. Various interactions and behaviors which respondents deemed off-nominal could be subsumed under poor expertise, mental disorder, forms of abuse and interpersonal insensitivity, problems of authority and responsibility, task deficits, poor hygiene and fitness, poor field-base communication, and human error with equipment from violating safety procedures and poor judgment as to its usage.
太空探索在许多方面类似于其他极端环境探索。自太空计划启动以来,社会和行为科学家预测,随着任务持续时间、机组人员规模和异质性的增加,太空船员将越来越多地开始出现其他极端环境任务中出现的越轨行为。然而,该国航天局长期忽视那些在未来载人航天中将发挥至关重要作用的心理社会人为因素。作者认为,这适得其反,甚至是危险的,必须进行社会和行为研究,以生成关于极端环境中功能失调行为的基线数据,包括太空任务环境。研究越轨行为的发生情况和频率的一个障碍是在极端环境中缺乏对这类行为的标准化定义。借用美国国家航空航天局(NASA)经过净化的术语“异常”,该术语通常指适应不良的行为,在五名从事极端环境中人际互动工作的科学家中进行了一项初步可靠性测试。他们被要求对几次实际太空和极地探险中的情况进行评分,以确定异常行为的数量。他们被告知该练习的目的是得出一个标准化定义,并且没有得到关于异常的任何具体定义。他们评分中的实质性一致提供了可靠信息,以构建异常行为的工作定义。受访者认为异常的各种互动和行为可归纳为专业知识不足、精神障碍、虐待形式和人际不敏感、权威和责任问题、任务缺陷、卫生和健康状况差、野外基地沟通不良以及因违反安全程序和对设备使用判断失误导致的人为设备错误。