Rubegni Pietro, Burroni Marco, Cevenini Gabriele, Perotti Roberto, Dell'Eva Giordana, Barbini Paolo, Fimiani Michele, Andreassi Lucio
Department of Dermatology and Department of Heart Surgery and Biomedical Technology, University of Siena; LegaTumori, Siena, Italy.
J Invest Dermatol. 2002 Aug;119(2):471-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2002.01835.x.
Noninvasive diagnostic methods such as dermoscopy or epiluminescence light microscopy have been developed in an attempt to improve diagnostic accuracy of pigmented skin lesions. The evaluation of the many morphologic characteristics of pigmented skin lesions observable by epiluminescence light microscopy, however, is often extremely complex and subjective. With the aim of obviating these problems of qualitative interpretation, methods based on mathematical analysis of pigmented skin lesions have recently been designed. These methods are based on computerized analysis of digital images obtained by epiluminescence light microscopy. In this study we used a digital dermoscopy analyzer with 147 clinically atypical pigmented skin lesions (90 nevi and 57 melanomas) to determine its discriminating power with respect to histologic diagnosis. The system evaluated 48 objective parameters used to train an artificial neural network. Using the artificial neural network with 10 variables selected by a stepwise procedure, we obtained a maximum accuracy in distinguishing melanoma from benign lesions of about 93%. Comparing this result with those of the many studies using classical epiluminescence light microscopy, it emerges that the method proposed is equal or even superior in diagnostic accuracy and has the advantage of not depending on the expertise of the clinician who examines the lesion.
诸如皮肤镜检查或表皮透光显微镜检查等非侵入性诊断方法已被开发出来,旨在提高色素性皮肤病变的诊断准确性。然而,通过表皮透光显微镜检查可观察到的色素性皮肤病变的许多形态学特征的评估往往极其复杂且主观。为了避免这些定性解释的问题,最近设计了基于色素性皮肤病变数学分析的方法。这些方法基于对通过表皮透光显微镜检查获得的数字图像的计算机化分析。在本研究中,我们使用数字皮肤镜分析仪对147例临床非典型色素性皮肤病变(90例痣和57例黑色素瘤)进行分析,以确定其对组织学诊断的鉴别能力。该系统评估了用于训练人工神经网络的48个客观参数。使用通过逐步程序选择的10个变量的人工神经网络,我们在区分黑色素瘤与良性病变方面获得了约93%的最大准确率。将该结果与许多使用经典表皮透光显微镜检查的研究结果进行比较,可以看出所提出的方法在诊断准确性上相当甚至更优,并且具有不依赖于检查病变的临床医生专业知识的优势。